Case ID |
ffbbc861-9518-4486-ae0d-ab13eaefd7bb |
Body |
View case body. Login to View |
Case Number |
T.C. NOS. 450 AND 451 OF 2000 |
Decision Date |
Dec 15, 2003 |
Hearing Date |
|
Decision |
The Madras High Court dismissed the appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, holding that the distribution of prizes under the District Level Gift Linked Savings Mobilisation Scheme did not constitute a 'lottery' within the meaning of Section 194B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the chance given to the investor to win a prize was a free chance and not a chance given in return for a price or contribution paid. Consequently, the provisions of Section 194B were not applicable, and the penalty imposed for not deducting tax at source was cancelled. |
Summary |
In this landmark case decided by the Madras High Court on December 15, 2003, the primary legal question was whether the distribution of prizes under the District Level Gift Linked Savings Mobilisation Scheme constituted a 'lottery' under Section 194B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court examined the nature of the scheme, where investors who invested more than Rs. 1,000 were given prize coupons without any additional payment. The lucky coupon was chosen by lot, and the holder received prizes. The court held that since the chance to win was a free chance and not given in return for a price or contribution, it did not amount to a lottery. The court also noted that the Explanation added to Section 2(24)(ix) in 2002 was not retrospective and did not apply to the assessment year 1998-99. As a result, the appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax were dismissed. This decision underscores the importance of understanding the legal definition of 'lottery' and highlights the nuances of tax law as it pertains to winnings from lotteries. Keywords such as 'Income-tax Act', 'lottery definition', and 'tax deduction at source' are central to this case and are crucial for understanding the court's reasoning. |
Court |
Madras High Court
|
Entities Involved |
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Deputy Director of Small Savings
|
Judges |
R. Jayasimha Babu,
S.R. Singharavelu
|
Lawyers |
K. Subramanian,
V. Ramachandran
|
Petitioners |
Commissioner of Income Tax
|
Respondents |
Deputy Director of Small Savings
|
Citations |
2004 SLD 2207,
2004 266 ITR 27
|
Other Citations |
AIR 1936 Mad. 225,
[1976] 3 All. ER 737,
[1980] 1 All. ER 866
|
Laws Involved |
Income-tax Act, 1961
|
Sections |
194B,
2(24)(ix)
|