| Case ID |
ff6e6211-46d7-43f1-a065-20f5be63671b |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Diary No. 149609/22 |
| Decision Date |
Oct 11, 2022 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Lahore High Court, in its decision dated October 11, 2022, addressed the matters concerning the Electronic Transactions Ordinance, 2002, specifically Section 12. The court considered arguments presented by both the petitioner and the respondents, with a focus on the applicability of electronic transactions within the legal framework. The court emphasized the importance of ensuring that electronic transactions are conducted in a manner that is secure and reliable. The court's decision reflects a growing recognition of the need for legal standards that keep pace with technological advancements. The judges ruled in favor of the petitioner, affirming the need for clarity and regulation in electronic transactions to protect both consumers and service providers. This decision is significant as it sets a precedent for future cases involving electronic transactions and underscores the judiciary's role in adapting legal principles to contemporary challenges. |
| Summary |
This case from the Lahore High Court revolves around the interpretation and application of the Electronic Transactions Ordinance, 2002, particularly focusing on Section 12. The petitioner, Akeel Ahmad, challenged the practices of the Punjab Public Service Commission regarding electronic transactions. The court's ruling emphasized the necessity of establishing secure and reliable electronic transaction frameworks to protect the rights of individuals and entities involved. Given the rapid advancement of technology and its intersection with legal processes, this case highlights the judiciary's commitment to ensuring that legal regulations keep pace with technological innovations. The decision serves as a crucial reference point for future cases, ensuring that electronic transactions are properly governed under the law. The involvement of various advocates and legal representatives underscores the complexity of the case, reflecting the diverse perspectives on electronic legal frameworks. Keywords such as 'electronic transactions', 'legal standards', 'Lahore High Court', and 'Electronic Transactions Ordinance' are essential for understanding the implications of this ruling in the context of contemporary legal challenges. |
| Court |
Lahore High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
MUZAMIL AKHTAR SHABIR
|
| Lawyers |
Mr. Saif ur Rehman Jasra,
Mr. Muhammad Jehan Zaib,
Hassan Khalid Ranjha,
Ahmad Hassan Khan Khichi,
Syed Sabahat Hussain Hamdani,
Alamdar Hussain,
Mir Haroon ur Rasheed
|
| Petitioners |
Akeel Ahmad
|
| Respondents |
Chairman, Punjab Public Service Commission, Lahore
|
| Citations |
2022 SLD 6507
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Electronic Transactions Ordinance, 2002
|
| Sections |
12
|