Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID ff4910a8-6c7c-4130-8b1b-b5aa18f3a2b2
Body View case body.
Case Number 622/929 of 1984
Decision Date May 12, 1985
Hearing Date
Decision The Tribunal found that the adverse remarks recorded against Ch. Muhammad Ayub, Assistant Excise and Taxation Officer, were vague and contradictory. The remarks stated that there were 'no big seizure/detection during the period' but did not provide sufficient facts to substantiate these claims. The appellant demonstrated that his performance was significantly better than that of his predecessor, achieving higher recoveries and detections. Consequently, the Tribunal expunged the adverse remarks from the record, emphasizing that the good work done by the appellant should have been recognized by his superiors.
Summary In the case of Ch. Muhammad Ayub vs. Secretary to Government QF Punjab, Excise and Taxation Department, the Service Tribunal addressed an appeal under the Punjab Service Tribunals Act regarding adverse remarks made against the appellant. The appellant contested the remarks, stating that they were baseless and did not reflect his actual performance. The Tribunal examined the evidence provided, including comparative figures of seizures and tax recoveries, which indicated that the appellant's performance during his tenure was superior to that of his predecessor. The Tribunal concluded that the remarks were unjustified and ordered their expungement. This case highlights the importance of accurate performance evaluations in public service and the need for due process in recording adverse remarks against officials.
Court Service Tribunal, Punjab
Entities Involved Not available
Judges ABDUL HAMID CHAUDHRY
Lawyers Muhammad Aslam Sheikh, A. G. Humayun
Petitioners Ch. MUHAMMAD AYUB
Respondents SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT QF PUNJAB, EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT AND 3 OTHERS
Citations 1985 SLD 2267, 1985 PLC 960
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)
Sections 4