| Case ID |
f7dc37fc-d7a0-4b7e-a4ce-93b58123c435 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Civil Petition No. 1499-L of 1997 |
| Decision Date |
Jul 30, 1998 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The petitioner's request to challenge the Service Tribunal's order dated September 10, 1997, was dismissed. The Service Tribunal had resolved the main appeal by reinstating the petitioner and deciding on benefits for the intervening period. The authorities implemented the Tribunal's directions, including partial payment for the intervening period. The Tribunal determined that the petitioner had no right to compel a re-evaluation of the entire case after the implementation of its order. Furthermore, the petition for leave to appeal was deemed time-barred by eight days, with no acceptable explanation provided for the delay. Consequently, the application for leave was dismissed, and the request for relief was denied. |
| Summary |
This case revolves around the reinstatement of a civil servant following a decision by the Service Tribunal. The petitioner, Haji NASEER AHMED, sought to clarify the extent of benefits due during the intervening period after being reinstated. The Tribunal had directed that the petitioner be reinstated and that the authorities determine the benefits for the intervening period. However, the authorities only provided partial payment, leading the petitioner to file a miscellaneous petition seeking full payment. The Tribunal ruled that the order had been implemented and that the petitioner had no right to demand a re-evaluation of the case. Additionally, the petition for leave to appeal was dismissed on the grounds of being time-barred, as the petitioner failed to provide a valid explanation for the delay. This case highlights the procedural nuances surrounding civil service reinstatement and the implications of timely appeals in administrative law. Important keywords include civil service, reinstatement, Service Tribunal, administrative law, and appeal process, which are relevant to current legal discussions and can enhance visibility in search engines. |
| Court |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
IRSHAD HASAN KHAN,
CH. MUHAMMAD ARIF
|
| Lawyers |
Muhammad Iqbal,
Tanvir Ahmed
|
| Petitioners |
Haji NASEER AHMED
|
| Respondents |
The SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, RAWALPINDI
|
| Citations |
1999 SLD 368,
1999 SCMR 1121
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973),
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
|
| Sections |
4,
212(3)
|