Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID f73b4cca-d223-4bb3-8140-2d2f7270d287
Body View case body.
Case Number Appeal No. 203(L) of 1986
Decision Date Mar 26, 1987
Hearing Date Mar 26, 1987
Decision The Federal Service Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, Parvez Iqbal, stating that he had been encadred in the cadre of LDC/Meter Reader effective from September 17, 1985. The tribunal found that the orders issued by the Superintending Engineer could not be rescinded without the appellant's consent. The appellant was initially appointed as LDC and later temporarily assigned duties of Meter Reader, which the tribunal recognized as a legitimate encadrement. The decision annulled the order which reverted him to the post of LDC, allowing him to count his seniority from the date he was encadred as LDC/Meter Reader.
Summary In the case of Parvez Iqbal vs. Superintending Engineer (E), WAPDA, the Federal Service Tribunal examined the encadrement status of the appellant. Parvez Iqbal was appointed as LDC and subsequently assigned the duties of Meter Reader. The tribunal emphasized the importance of consent in changing an employee's cadre. The decision highlighted the legal principles surrounding seniority and encadrement under the Service Tribunals Act. The tribunal ruled that the appellant should be recognized in the cadre of LDC/Meter Reader from September 17, 1985, and his seniority should be counted from that date. The case illustrates key aspects of employment law and the rights of employees regarding their designated roles and seniority. Keywords include Service Tribunals Act, encadrement, seniority, employment law, WAPDA, and Federal Service Tribunal.
Court Federal Service Tribunal
Entities Involved Not available
Judges JUSTICE SHAH ABDUR RASHID, CH. A. REHMAN KHAN
Lawyers Tariq Masood, Amanullah Khan Niazi
Petitioners PARVEZ IQBAL
Respondents another, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (E), WAPDA
Citations 1988 SLD 1023, 1988 PLC 364
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)
Sections 4