Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID f6a96d50-ceca-4219-b390-970f9a7abd55
Body View case body.
Case Number Civil Revision No. 878-P of 2012
Decision Date Oct 05, 2015
Hearing Date Sep 18, 2015
Decision The Peshawar High Court dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioners, affirming the decision of the Appellate Court. The court found that the plaintiffs had properly instituted their suit for the recovery of the sale amount with the necessary leave of the court, thus falling outside the bar of Order II, Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Code. The earlier dismissals of the suit for specific performance did not preclude the plaintiffs from claiming the recovery of the sale consideration since they had been granted permission to file a fresh suit for that purpose. The court emphasized that the principle of constructive res judicata did not apply in this case, and the petitioners' arguments regarding the suit's maintainability were rejected.
Summary This case revolves around the legal principles of constructive res judicata and the Civil Procedure Code's provisions regarding the inclusion of claims in a suit. The plaintiffs initially sought specific performance of an agreement to sell a plot but later pursued recovery of the sale amount after their initial suit was dismissed. The court allowed them to file a fresh suit for recovery, emphasizing that such action was permissible under the law when leave was obtained. The judgment highlights the importance of ensuring that plaintiffs are not unfairly barred from pursuing legitimate claims due to procedural technicalities, particularly when they have acted with judicial permission.
Court Peshawar High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges ROOH UL AMIN KHAN, J
Lawyers Wajid Sattar, Khanzeb Rahim
Petitioners FAYAZ MUHAMMAD and 2 others
Respondents KIFAYATULLAH and another
Citations 2016 SLD 982, 2016 CLC 866
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)
Sections O. II, R. 2, S.12