Case ID |
f6738384-160f-4ccb-a64a-c0b1576642c7 |
Body |
View case body. Login to View |
Case Number |
TAX CASE No. 186 OF 1960 (REFERENCE No. 84 OF 1960 |
Decision Date |
Oct 29, 1962 |
Hearing Date |
|
Decision |
The Madras High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal, confirming that the profits derived by Matheson Bosanquet and Co. from the sale of shares were assessable as income from an adventure in the nature of trade. The court found that the evidence supported the conclusion that the assessee had the intention of selling the shares at the time of acquisition, and that the transaction was not merely an investment to secure a capital asset, but rather a business venture aimed at generating profit. The assessee's claim that they were acquiring shares solely to maintain their managing agency was rejected, reinforcing the Tribunal's findings. |
Summary |
In the case of Matheson Bosanquet and Co. (P.) Ltd v. Commissioner of INCOME TAX, the Madras High Court addressed the issue of whether profits from the sale of shares were taxable under the Income Tax Act, 1922. The court concluded that the transaction constituted an adventure in the nature of trade, as the assessee intended to sell the shares shortly after acquiring them. The decision emphasized the importance of the taxpayer's intention in determining the nature of the transaction and its tax implications. This case is significant for tax law practitioners and companies involved in investments, as it clarifies the criteria under which profits from share transactions are assessed for tax purposes. Keywords include Income Tax Act, adventure in nature of trade, tax implications, and managing agency. |
Court |
Madras High Court
|
Entities Involved |
Commissioner of INCOME TAX,
Matheson Bosanquet and Co. (P.) Ltd
|
Judges |
Jagadisan,
Srinivasan
|
Lawyers |
K. Srinivasan for the Applicant,
S. Ranganathan for the Respondent
|
Petitioners |
Matheson Bosanquet and Co. (P.) Ltd
|
Respondents |
Commissioner of INCOME TAX
|
Citations |
1964 SLD 323 = (1964) 52 ITR 380
|
Other Citations |
Rajputana Textiles (Agencies) Ltd. v. CIT [1961] 42 ITR 743 (SC),
Ramnarain Sons (P.) Ltd. v. CIT [1961] 41 ITR 534 (SC),
Smith Barry v. Cordy [1946] 28 Tax 250
|
Laws Involved |
Income Tax Act, 1922
|
Sections |
2(4)
|