Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID f60d69dd-c258-4b86-ac4a-13dff1569012
Body View case body.
Case Number Civil Petition No.1023 of 1983
Decision Date Sep 14, 1988
Hearing Date Sep 14, 1988
Decision The Supreme Court reviewed the case where the respondents' suit for recovery of a significant sum of money had been previously dismissed for non-prosecution but later restored. The petitioner sought leave to appeal against the dismissal of his writ petition by the High Court. The Court found the cause for restoration presented by the respondents sufficient and held that the denial of relief by the High Court on the grounds of limitation did not warrant interference. Accordingly, leave to appeal was refused.
Summary In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan dealt with a civil petition concerning the restoration of a suit for recovery of money that had been dismissed for non-prosecution. The petitioner, Syed Nawazish Ali, represented himself and contested the restoration, arguing that there was no sufficient cause for it and that the application was time-barred. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, emphasizing the sufficiency of the reasons provided for the restoration and clarifying that the High Court's discretionary powers regarding limitation should not be interfered with. The decision highlights the importance of procedural compliance and the courts' discretion in civil matters, making it a relevant case for those studying civil law and appeals in Pakistan. Keywords: civil petition, restoration of suit, recovery of money, Supreme Court Pakistan, discretionary jurisdiction.
Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Entities Involved UNITED BANK LTD.,
Judges MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, SAAD SAOOD JAN
Lawyers Syed NAWAZISH ALI,
Petitioners Syed NAWAZISH ALI
Respondents another, UNITED BANK LTD.
Citations 1989 SLD 618, 1989 SCMR 550, 1989 SLD 1174
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Sections 185(3), 199