Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID f5c5a85f-75ed-4f6a-8ae4-5911d31ac368
Body View case body.
Case Number LHR/ 1157 of 1978
Decision Date May 09, 1982
Hearing Date May 09, 1982
Decision The appeal was dismissed as the appellant's claims were not substantiated. The court found that the transfer from Duty Clerk to Time Checker did not constitute a change in category, as both posts were part of the same traffic staff. The claim of transfer due to union activities was also dismissed due to lack of evidence. The additional evidence submitted by the appellant was deemed unnecessary for the correct decision of the appeal. Therefore, the court upheld the lower court's decision, affirming the legality of the transfer and the abolition of the Duty Clerk post.
Summary In the case of Aman Ullah vs. Punjab Urban Transport Corporation, the Labour Appellate Tribunal of Punjab addressed an appeal regarding the transfer of the appellant from the position of Duty Clerk to Time Checker. The appellant contested the transfer, asserting that it represented a change in his job category and was motivated by his union activities as the Press Secretary of the Alfateh Mazdoor League. The court examined the nature of both positions and found them to be within the same operational category. Key arguments revolved around the legitimacy of the transfer and the circumstances surrounding the abolition of the Duty Clerk position. The evidence presented was insufficient to support the appellant's claims, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. This case highlights critical aspects of labor relations and the legal framework governing employee transfers within public transport entities in Punjab.
Court Labour Appellate Tribunal, Punjab
Entities Involved Punjab Urban Transport Corporation
Judges SARDAR MUHAMMAD ABDUL GHAFOOR KHAN LODHI
Lawyers Ch. Riasat Ali, Ch. Khalid Farooq, Syed Noor Ahmad
Petitioners AMAN ULLAH
Respondents PUNJAB URBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Citations 1984 SLD 1194, 1984 PLC 491
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Sections 37, 38, XLI, r. 27