| Case ID |
f583fc16-a948-4ce3-9720-c17d910e7218 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
D-2741 of 2016 |
| Decision Date |
|
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The court ruled that the reference regarding the depreciation rate on the plant and machinery used for manufacturing cement should be returned unanswered due to insubstantial tax effect. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal had previously allowed a depreciation rate of 15 percent based on earlier cases, and the same rationale was applied for the assessment year 1977-78. The court emphasized that it was following established precedents and did not find a reason for interference in the Tribunal's decision. |
| Summary |
In the case presented before the Delhi High Court, the primary issue revolved around the appropriate rate of depreciation for plant and machinery utilized in the manufacturing and packaging of cement for the assessment year 1977-78. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal had previously permitted a depreciation rate of 15 percent, aligning with earlier assessments from 1975-76 to 1983-84. The court upheld the Tribunal's ruling, stating that the reference to the High Court should be returned unanswered due to the insubstantial tax effect, thus favoring the assessee. This case highlights the importance of consistency in tax matters and the adherence to precedents set in earlier years. The ruling reinforces the principle that when tax effects are minimal, the judicial system encourages efficiency by avoiding unnecessary litigation. Such decisions contribute to a more streamlined tax process and reflect the judiciary's commitment to uphold fair practices in tax assessments. Notably, the case underscores the significance of legal representation in tax disputes, as the presence of experienced advocates can significantly influence outcomes in favor of the clients. The decision serves as a precedent for similar cases where tax implications are minor, promoting a focus on substantial issues within tax law. |
| Court |
Delhi High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
|
| Judges |
A. K. Sikri,
Ms. Reva Khetrapal
|
| Lawyers |
Sanjeev Sabharwal,
P.N. Monga,
Manu Monga
|
| Petitioners |
Commissioner of Income Tax
|
| Respondents |
J.K. Synthetics Ltd.
|
| Citations |
2010 SLD 2927 = (2010) 328 ITR 6
|
| Other Citations |
I.T.R. No. 286 of 1987
|
| Laws Involved |
Income-tax Act, 1961
|
| Sections |
256
|