| Case ID |
f4f2be78-6345-43bb-9549-2b37a5859aa0 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Writ Petition No. 67 of 2014 |
| Decision Date |
Apr 21, 2015 |
| Hearing Date |
Apr 21, 2015 |
| Decision |
The writ petition filed by the petitioner company, which is a contractor, was found to be incompetent and frivolous. The case revolved around the contractual liability of the parties involved. The authorities had initiated action against the petitioner company for alleged violations of the contract terms. However, the petitioner company asserted their right to damages under the contract for the suspended period. The court determined that the actions of the authorities did not amount to a violation of the constitutional rights of the petitioner, nor did they reflect any disparity. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed. |
| Summary |
This case involves a writ petition filed by Five Star Construction Company against the Provincial Government through the Chief Secretary and others. The petitioner claimed that the authorities had taken actions against them alleging breaches of the contract. The case revolved around the question of contractual liability and the rights of the contractor. The court found that the actions taken by the authorities did not infringe upon any constitutional rights of the petitioner, which led to the dismissal of the writ petition. This case underscores the importance of understanding contractual obligations and the limits of judicial intervention in matters of contractual disputes. It highlights the need for parties to adhere to the terms of their agreements and the judicial system's role in resolving such disputes. Keywords such as 'writ petition', 'contractual liability', 'judicial intervention', and 'contract disputes' are relevant in the context of this case and can help in improving the visibility of related legal discussions online. |
| Court |
Not specified
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
MUHAMMAD ALAM,
YAR MUHAMMAD
|
| Lawyers |
Sher Baz Ali Khan,
Assistant Advocate General for Respondents Nos. 1 to 5, 7 to 8,
Qaiser Ali Shah
|
| Petitioners |
FIVE STAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR
|
| Respondents |
8 OTHERS,
PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY G.B.
|
| Citations |
2016 SLD 2117,
2016 YLR 204
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Not available
|
| Sections |
Not available
|