| Case ID |
ea89c55d-459a-42ac-a4a3-7059338ac8eb |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Criminal Original No. 1881-W of 2012 |
| Decision Date |
Mar 07, 2012 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Lahore High Court dismissed the petition for contempt of court filed by the petitioners, who were non-gazetted employees of the Forest Department. The court found that there was no provision in the West Pakistan Forest Manual allowing a 20% allowance in lieu of firewood quota for these employees. The court noted that the petitioners had not been granted the relief they sought and had instead been directed to seek a decision on their representation from the relevant authorities. The court emphasized that contempt proceedings should not be initiated for the advantage of one party and that the proper legal channels should be followed for grievances regarding financial claims. The court concluded that no contempt had been committed by the respondents and thus the petition was dismissed. |
| Summary |
This case revolves around a contempt petition filed by non-gazetted employees of the Forest Department claiming a 20% allowance in lieu of firewood quota. The Lahore High Court ruled that the West Pakistan Forest Manual does not provide for such an allowance, and therefore, the respondents could not be compelled to comply with the petitioners' demands under contempt proceedings. The court highlighted the importance of adhering to legal protocols and pursuing alternative remedies available under the law. This decision underscores the balance between individual claims and institutional integrity within the judicial system. Key terms related to this case include 'contempt of court', 'firewood quota', 'West Pakistan Forest Manual', and 'judicial review'. Understanding these aspects offers insight into the legal landscape surrounding employment benefits within government departments, particularly regarding the authority of public officials in financial matters. The ruling serves as a precedent for similar cases involving claims against state entities and the appropriate legal recourse available to aggrieved parties. |
| Court |
Lahore High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
MUHAMMAD FARRUKH IRFAN KHAN, J
|
| Lawyers |
Ch. Muhammad Sarwar,
Waqas Qadeer Dar,
Rukhsana Rana,
Malik Mehboob-ur-Rehman
|
| Petitioners |
,
BADAR MUNEER
|
| Respondents |
others,
BADAR HASSAN BHARWANA
|
| Citations |
2012 SLD 2466,
2012 YLR 1909
|
| Other Citations |
Fecto Belarus Tractor Ltd. v. Government of Pakistan through Finance Economic Affairs and others PLD 2005 SC 605
|
| Laws Involved |
West Pakistan Forest Manual, 1964,
Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003,
Constitution of Pakistan
|
| Sections |
15.10(1),
15.10(2),
3,
204
|