Case ID |
e80b7b68-3f16-41e6-ab7d-52309b0779bc |
Body |
View case body. Login to View |
Case Number |
Criminal Appeal No. 179 of 2022 |
Decision Date |
Nov 21, 2022 |
Hearing Date |
|
Decision |
The Islamabad High Court, in its decision dated November 21, 2022, addressed the appeal presented by AQEEL MIRZA against the STATE. The court examined the merits of the case, considering the evidence and legal arguments put forth by both sides. The judges, TARIQ MEHMOOD JAHANGIRI and BABAR SATTAR, delivered their judgment after careful deliberation, emphasizing the importance of upholding justice and the rule of law in their ruling. The court's decision reflects a commitment to ensuring that all parties receive a fair hearing in accordance with legal standards. |
Summary |
This case involves an appeal before the Islamabad High Court regarding a criminal matter. The court's ruling, delivered by judges TARIQ MEHMOOD JAHANGIRI and BABAR SATTAR, highlights significant legal principles pertinent to criminal law. The appeal was filed by AQEEL MIRZA against the STATE, raising questions about the application of law and the rights of the accused. The judges' analysis reflects current trends in legal interpretation and the necessity for fair trials. The case underscores the judicial system's role in maintaining justice and public confidence in law enforcement. Key legal terms and concepts discussed include the presumption of innocence, due process, and the burden of proof, which are essential for understanding the implications of the court's decision. This ruling is anticipated to influence future cases and legal discourse in Pakistan, particularly in criminal law contexts. The decision reinforces the judiciary's position as a guardian of individual rights and liberties, aligning with contemporary judicial practices and standards. |
Court |
Islamabad High Court
|
Entities Involved |
Not available
|
Judges |
TARIQ MEHMOOD JAHANGIRI,
BABAR SATTAR
|
Lawyers |
Not available
|
Petitioners |
AQEEL MIRZA
|
Respondents |
The STATE
|
Citations |
2023 SLD 945,
2023 MLD 793
|
Other Citations |
Not available
|
Laws Involved |
Not available
|
Sections |
Not available
|