| Case ID |
e1049122-c5e9-4785-b1a8-24d023b71e57 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
D-2741 of 2016 |
| Decision Date |
|
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The court held that there was no concealment of income in the revised return filed by the partnership firm, Basal Tools Co., for the assessment year 1968-69. Therefore, the prosecution of the partners was misconceived and amounted to an abuse of process of law. The complaint against the firm and one of its partners, S, was quashed concerning offences under sections 193, 196, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code due to the absence of a proper complaint filed by the concerned Income Tax Officer or the Commissioner. However, proceedings under section 277 of the Income-tax Act would continue since the complaint was filed at the instance of the Commissioner. The court also noted that section 276C could not be retrospectively applied to the assessment year 1968-69 as it was inserted after the relevant date. Thus, the complaint could only proceed against the firm and S regarding accusations under section 277. |
| Summary |
The case of Basal Tools Co. v. Income Tax Officer revolves around the prosecution of a partnership firm and its partners for alleged false statements and concealment of income in their tax return for the assessment year 1968-69. The court examined the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961, particularly sections 276C and 277, alongside relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code. It was determined that the revised return filed did not conceal any income, leading to the quashing of the prosecution against certain partners. The ruling emphasizes the importance of proper legal procedures in filing complaints under tax laws and clarifies that retrospective application of laws is not permissible. This case highlights the intersection of tax law and criminal law, illustrating the judiciary's role in upholding legal standards and protecting taxpayers from unwarranted prosecution. |
| Court |
Punjab and Haryana High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Income Tax Officer,
Basal Tools Co.
|
| Judges |
S.D. BAJAJ, J.
|
| Lawyers |
Balwant Singh Gupta,
Sanjay Bansal,
Ashok Bhan,
A.K. Mittal
|
| Petitioners |
Basal Tools Co.
|
| Respondents |
Income Tax Officer
|
| Citations |
1990 SLD 1999,
(1990) 184 ITR 303
|
| Other Citations |
Basal Tools Co. v. ITO [1987] 167 ITR 24/ 34 Taxman 9 (Punj. & Har.),
Veerakistiah v. ITO [1983] 139 ITR 113 (AP),
ITO v. Kerala Oil Mills [1986] 162 ITR 292 (Ker.)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income-tax Act, 1961,
Indian Penal Code, 1860
|
| Sections |
276C,
277,
193,
463,
477,
120B
|