Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID e00e9c54-388a-424b-ba09-233ac3415882
Body View case body.
Case Number TAX CASE No. 1219 OF 1977
Decision Date Nov 22, 1982
Hearing Date
Decision The Madras High Court ruled that Simpson & Co. Ltd. was entitled to a higher rate of development rebate for the machinery installed for constructing bus bodies. The court determined that a bus body qualifies as either an automobile ancillary or the result of constructing the body of a motor truck or bus. Therefore, the machinery used in this process is eligible for the higher development rebate under the Income-tax Act, specifically under section 33. The Tribunal's earlier decision was upheld, allowing the assessee's claim.
Summary In the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Simpson & Co. Ltd., the Madras High Court addressed the eligibility for a higher rate of development rebate under section 33 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The case revolved around the assessee's claim for development rebate on new machinery used for the construction of bus bodies. The court concluded that the machinery in question fell under the categories specified in the Fifth Schedule of the Income-tax Act, thus entitling the company to claim the higher rebate. The judgment highlighted the importance of accurately categorizing machinery and understanding the definitions within tax law, particularly in the context of manufacturing and construction. The ruling reinforced the notion that tax benefits must be available to entities utilizing machinery for the production of goods that contribute to the automotive industry, thereby supporting economic growth.
Court Madras High Court
Entities Involved Commissioner of Income Tax, Simpson & Co. Ltd.
Judges BALASUBRAHMANYAN, J., RATNAM, J.
Lawyers J. Jayaraman, Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram, S.V. Subramaniam
Petitioners Commissioner of Income Tax
Respondents Simpson & Co. Ltd.
Citations 1983 SLD 865, (1983) 141 ITR 35
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Income-tax Act, 1961
Sections 33