Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID e0016014-dea9-486d-b5dd-479a325ab677
Body View case body.
Case Number IT REFERRED CASE No. 10 OF 1967
Decision Date Sep 23, 1967
Hearing Date
Decision The court ruled that the disallowance of the sum claimed by the assessee was justified. It was found that the remuneration paid to 'M' was not made exclusively for business purposes. The court emphasized that to qualify for a deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, it must be shown that the payment was made wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the business. In this case, the payment was deemed motivated by non-commercial considerations. The conclusion reached by the authorities was supported by evidence and was not unreasonable or perverse.
Summary In the case of Haji K. Assainar v. Commissioner of INCOME TAX, the Kerala High Court addressed the issue of whether certain payments made to an individual, 'M', could be classified as business expenditure under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court examined the qualifications and roles of 'M', who was found to lack the necessary experience and training to justify the high remuneration he received. The court concluded that the payments were not made for business purposes, thus disallowing the claim. This case highlights the importance of establishing that payments are made wholly and exclusively for business purposes to qualify for tax deductions. Keywords: Income-tax Act, business expenditure, tax deductions, remuneration, Kerala High Court.
Court Kerala High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges M.S. Menon, C.J., V. Balakrishna Eradi, J
Lawyers V.A. Syed Mohammed, C. George, C.T. Peter
Petitioners Haji K. Assainar
Respondents Commissioner of INCOME TAX
Citations 1968 SLD 272 = (1968) 69 ITR 154
Other Citations CIT v. Chandulal Keshavlal & Co. [1960] 38 ITR 601 (SC), Jethabhai Hirji & Co. v. CIT [1949] 17 ITR 533 (Bom.)
Laws Involved Income-tax Act, 1961
Sections 37(1)