Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID df2dbb87-6bf1-4e03-a7ec-6cd3aec83af8
Body View case body.
Case Number Civil Appeal No. 38-D of 1960
Decision Date Jan 25, 1962
Hearing Date
Decision The Supreme Court of Pakistan accepted the appeal, set aside the order of the High Court, and remanded the second appeal for hearing in accordance with law. The court found that substantial questions of law merited consideration, which the High Court failed to address. The court emphasized the importance of providing reasons for dismissals to uphold justice and ensure transparency in judicial proceedings.
Summary This case concerns a civil appeal regarding the refund of excise duty claimed by the appellant, MESSRS ABDUL MAJID & COMPANY. The appeal was against a judgment that dismissed the suit for refund, asserting the right to a rebate under the Central Excise Rules. The Supreme Court emphasized that significant legal questions were raised, warranting a thorough examination by the High Court. The ruling underscored the necessity of providing reasons for appeal dismissals, aligning with principles of justice and transparency. Key topics include civil procedure, excise duty refunds, and judicial practices, making it a pivotal case for understanding procedural law in Pakistan.
Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Entities Involved Not available
Judges A. R. CORNELIUS, C.J., S. A. RAHMAN, HAMOODUR RAHMAN, J.
Lawyers Ruhul Islam Advocate, Siddique Ahmad Chowdhury Attorney for Appellant, A. B. Mahmud Hussain Senior Advocate, Md. Jane Alam Advocate, A.W. Mallik Attorney for Respondents Nos. 1, 4, 5 and 6, T. H. Khan Advocate, Nurul Haq Bhuiyan Attorney for Respondent No. 2
Petitioners MESSRS ABDUL MAJID & COMPANY
Respondents THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, others
Citations 1962 SLD 459, 1962 PLD 69
Other Citations Rami Deka v. Brojo Nath I L R 25 Cal. 97
Laws Involved Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Central Excise Rules, 1944
Sections O. XLI, r. II, Rule 12, Rule 189