| Case ID |
d691ae03-0f14-4217-84d1-7daba5481b32 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
IT REFERENCE No. 141 OF 1964 |
| Decision Date |
Oct 31, 1969 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The court held that a firm should not be allowed to reduce its profits by payment of salary, commission or remuneration to its partners, and that there should also be no double taxation of profits or any portion thereof in the hands of partners. The remuneration paid to partners was not an allowable deduction in the computation of profits of the firm as per the clear provisions of section 10(4)(b) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The Tribunal's decision to allow the deduction was overturned, affirming the Income Tax Officer's disallowance of the deductions claimed for the assessment years 1955-56 and 1956-57. |
| Summary |
In the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ram Laxman Sugar Mills, the Allahabad High Court addressed important aspects of tax law concerning the disallowance of deductions for payments made by a firm to its partners. The court examined the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961, particularly section 40(b), and its predecessor, section 10(4)(b) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The case arose from an unregistered firm engaged in sugar manufacturing, where the Government of India had taken over the business and constituted a Board of Management composed of partners from the firm. The remuneration paid to these partners was disallowed by the Income Tax Officer and subsequently upheld by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Tribunal, however, had set aside this decision, leading to a reference to the High Court. Ultimately, the court concluded that payments made to partners in the form of salary or remuneration are not deductible for tax purposes, reinforcing the principle that a firm cannot reduce its taxable profits through such payments. This decision has significant implications for tax planning and compliance for partnerships and unregistered firms, as it clarifies the tax treatment of partner remuneration and aims to prevent double taxation of income. |
| Court |
Allahabad High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Ram Laxman Sugar Mills,
Government of India,
Central Government
|
| Judges |
V.G. OAK, C.J.,
T.P. MUKERJEE, J
|
| Lawyers |
Shanti Bhushan,
Dr. R.R. Misra,
Satyapal,
D.S. Randhawa
|
| Petitioners |
Commissioner of Income Tax
|
| Respondents |
Ram Laxman Sugar Mills
|
| Citations |
1970 SLD 460 = (1970) 76 ITR 123
|
| Other Citations |
Dulichand Laxminarayan v. CIT [1956] 29 ITR 535 (SC)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income-tax Act, 1961,
Indian Income-tax Act, 1922
|
| Sections |
40(b),
10(4)(b)
|