| Case ID |
7f84d9d6-a482-48be-81db-efc4751f4b4f |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
D-2741 of 1962-63 |
| Decision Date |
Aug 29, 1978 |
| Hearing Date |
Aug 29, 1978 |
| Decision |
The court held that the Income Tax Officer (ITO) could not take advantage of the longer time limit provided in section 153(1)(b) because the normal period of limitation had expired without initiating any proceedings. It was determined that the assessment was barred by the limitation period, as the ITO failed to demonstrate concealment of income within the required timeframe. Consequently, the imposition of penalties under section 271(1)(c) was also deemed inappropriate since the initial assessment was invalid due to the expired limitation period. The decision emphasized the importance of timely action by tax authorities and the necessity of having sufficient grounds to extend assessment periods. |
| Summary |
This case revolves around the interpretation of the Income-tax Act, specifically sections concerning assessment and penalties for concealment of income. The key issue was whether the Income Tax Officer could extend the assessment period beyond the normal four years due to alleged concealment. The court ruled that since the ITO did not initiate any proceedings within the normal timeframe, the assessment was time-barred. Furthermore, the ITO's failure to substantiate claims of concealment meant that penalties could not be levied. This ruling underscores the criticality of adhering to statutory time limits in tax assessments, thereby protecting taxpayers' rights and ensuring fairness in the tax system. Keywords: Income Tax Act, assessment period, concealment of income, penalties, legal proceedings, tax compliance. |
| Court |
Calcutta High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
Dipak Kumar Sen,
Ajit Kumar Sengupta
|
| Lawyers |
Not available
|
| Petitioners |
M.B. Mercantile Co
|
| Respondents |
Commissioner of Income Tax
|
| Citations |
1988 SLD 1518 = (1988) 169 ITR 201
|
| Other Citations |
Anadi Nath Chakraborty v. CIT [1967] 64 ITR 456 (Cal.),
Ram Bilas Kedar Nath v. ITO [1964] 54 ITR 11 (All.),
CIT v. Surajpal Singh [1977] 108 ITR 746 (All.)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income-tax Act, 1961
|
| Sections |
153(1)(b),
271(1)(c),
271(4A),
143(3)
|