| Case ID |
6984df55-eeb4-4374-8d33-d78d3d442db9 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Appeal No. 771/255 of 1987 |
| Decision Date |
Apr 05, 1988 |
| Hearing Date |
Dec 15, 1987 |
| Decision |
The appeal by Muhammad Ashraf Mirza against the Government of the Punjab was dismissed by the Service Tribunal, Punjab. The court held that the Punjab Labour Department Service Rules, 1987 were valid and properly enacted under the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974. The tribunal found no merit in the appellant’s arguments concerning the retrospective application of the rules and the alleged violation of constitutional provisions. Consequently, the tribunal concluded that the appellant’s promotion was governed by the new rules and the old rules of 1969 were repealed, rendering them invalid. The appeal was dismissed without any order as to cost due to the complex legal issues involved. |
| Summary |
In the landmark case of Muhammad Ashraf Mirza v. Government of the Punjab, the Service Tribunal, Punjab, addressed pivotal issues surrounding the validity and application of the Punjab Labour Department Service Rules, 1987. The appellant, Muhammad Ashraf Mirza, challenged his non-promotion based on the transition from the West Pakistan Labour Welfare Subordinate Service Rules, 1969 to the newly promulgated Punjab Labour Department Service Rules, 1987. Central to the case were arguments related to the retrospective application of the new rules, potential violations of constitutional provisions under Articles 240 and 241 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), and the jurisdictional authority of the Service Tribunal itself.
The Tribunal meticulously examined the legislative framework, focusing on the Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974) and the General Clauses Act (X of 1897), to determine the legality of the rule changes. The appellant asserted that the absence of a repeal provision under Section 23 of the Civil Servants Act meant that the old rules could not be overridden by the new regulations. However, the Tribunal, referencing Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, rebutted this by affirming that the power to enact new rules inherently includes the authority to repeal existing ones.
Moreover, the case delved into the interpretation of constitutional articles, particularly Article 241, which was intended to bridge the transitional period between the enactment of the Constitution and the establishment of appropriate legislative acts governing civil service conditions. The Tribunal concluded that Article 241 was superseded by the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974, thereby validating the new service rules.
Another significant aspect was the Tribunal's authority to assess the vires of legislative rules. Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Tribunal affirmed its jurisdiction to evaluate the legality of the service rules, citing precedents that empowered Service Tribunals to scrutinize rules affecting civil servants' terms and conditions of service.
The decision underscored that promotions are not vested rights but are governed by the prevailing rules at the time of actual promotion. This principle was reinforced by citing Supreme Court decisions which consistently held that the government retains the authority to update service rules to enhance administrative efficiency without infringing on civil servants' rights.
In conclusion, the Service Tribunal deemed the Punjab Labour Department Service Rules, 1987 legally valid and binding, thereby dismissing the appellant's appeal. This decision not only reaffirms the Tribunal's role in adjudicating civil service disputes but also clarifies the legislative framework governing civil service conditions in Pakistan. The case serves as a crucial reference for future disputes related to administrative law, civil service regulations, and the interpretation of constitutional provisions affecting public servants. |
| Court |
Service Tribunal, Punjab
|
| Entities Involved |
Punjab Labour Department,
Directorate of Labour Welfare
|
| Judges |
Ihsanul Haq Chaudhry,
Kh. Muhammad Yousaf,
Ch. Abdul Rashid
|
| Lawyers |
Muhammad Sayeed Akhtar,
Humayun
|
| Petitioners |
Muhammad Ashraf Mirza
|
| Respondents |
Government of the Punjab
|
| Citations |
1988 SLD 1051,
1988 PLC 400
|
| Other Citations |
Brig. Retd. F.B. Ali P L D 1975 S C 506,
Muhammad Umar Malik v. Federal Service Tribunal,
Mst. Akhtar Begum v. The Government of the Punjab and others P L D 1980 Lah. 697,
Province of Punjab v. Syed Bashir Ahmad Bukhari P L D 1982 S C 28,
Iqan Ahmad Khurrum and others v. Government of Pakistan P L D 1979 Kar. 610,
Dr. Raja Manzoor Elahi v. N.-W.F. Province PLO 1980 Pesh. 1981,
Khalil-ur-Rehman and others v. Government of Pakistan and others P L D 1981 Kar. 750,
Islamic Republic of Pakistan v. Dr. Safdar Mahmood P L D 1983 S C 100,
Afzal Hussain Syed v. Punjab Government etc. PLD 1980 Lah. 697,
Muhammad Insha Ullah and others v. Chief Conservator of Forests (P&E) Punjab and others P L D 1988 S C 155
|
| Laws Involved |
Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974),
General Clauses Act (X of 1897),
Constitution of Pakistan (1973),
West Pakistan Labour Welfare Subordinate Service Rules, 1969,
Punjab Labour Department Service Rules, 1987,
Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)
|
| Sections |
S.23,
S.23,
S.21,
Arts.25,
Arts.27,
Art.212,
Art.240,
Art.241,
R.20,
R.10,
Section 23,
S.4
|