| Case ID |
67ae24d9-6485-495d-8b21-6cd3983e5b2d |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Civil Appeals Nos. 4589 and 4590 of 1992 |
| Decision Date |
Dec 09, 1997 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Supreme Court ruled that the commission paid by the partnership firm to Rashiklal P. Rathor, who was a partner, cannot be allowed as a deduction under section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that a firm is an association of individuals, and a Hindu undivided family cannot be a partner in a firm. Therefore, any commission paid to a partner representing a Hindu undivided family is still treated as a payment to the individual partner, and not to the family itself. The court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and the High Court in stating that the payment made by the firm to Rashiklal was a payment to a partner, and thus, the firm is not entitled to claim any deduction for this payment. |
| Summary |
In the landmark case of Rashik Lal & Co. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, the Supreme Court of India addressed the complexities surrounding partnership agreements and the implications of the Income Tax Act, 1961, specifically section 40(b). The case revolved around whether commission payments to partners could be deducted from a firm's taxable income. The court clarified that a partnership is strictly an association of individuals, and a Hindu undivided family cannot be recognized as a partner. Thus, any commission paid to a partner, even if they are acting on behalf of a family, is treated as remuneration to that individual alone. This ruling reinforced the legal interpretation that partners function in their personal capacity, and the firm cannot evade tax obligations on the premise of representing a family structure. The decision is significant for legal professionals and tax practitioners dealing with partnership taxation and the treatment of family entities in business structures. |
| Court |
Supreme Court of India
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
SUHAS C. SEN,
S. SAGHIR AHMAD
|
| Lawyers |
B. Gupta,
Mrs. Rakhi Ray,
Ms. Bina Gupta,
Mrs. T. Sudha,
B. Krishna Prasad
|
| Petitioners |
RASHIK LAL & Co
|
| Respondents |
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax
|
| Citations |
1998 SLD 254,
1998 PTD 2001,
(1998) 229 ITR 458,
(2000) 81 TAX 28
|
| Other Citations |
Dulichand Laxminarayan v. CIT (1956) 29 ITR 535 (SC),
CIT v. Bagyalakshami & Co. (1965) 55 ITR 660 (SC),
Brij Mohan Das Laxman Das v. CIT (1997) 223 ITR 825 (SC),
Suwalal Anandilal Jain v. CIT (1997) 224 ITR 753 (SC),
Rashiklal & Co. v. CIT (1992) 196 ITR 106
|
| Laws Involved |
Income Tax Act, 1961
|
| Sections |
40(b)
|