Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 5c7d01fb-585c-4f81-b65f-dc69018692c8
Body View case body.
Case Number Regular First Appeal No.362 of 2002
Decision Date Nov 27, 2002
Hearing Date
Decision The Lahore High Court allowed the application for leave to defend filed by the appellants, subject to the condition that they deposit the principal amount of all bank guarantees within three months. The court set aside the earlier judgment and decree passed by the Banking Court, which had dismissed the application for leave to defend, and remanded the case for a fresh decision. The court emphasized that all questions raised by the guarantors needed determination and consideration, particularly regarding the bank's right to encash guarantees after the validity period had expired.
Summary In the case of Regular First Appeal No.362 of 2002 at the Lahore High Court, the appellants challenged the Banking Court's decision which dismissed their application for leave to defend a suit for recovery of Rs.82,59,547.20 filed by Union Bank Limited. The court addressed key issues regarding the encashment of bank guarantees after their validity period had expired. The appellants argued that the guarantees were contested in a civil suit, and the encashment was mala fide. The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the previous judgment and remanding the case for a fresh hearing, highlighting the necessity for a thorough examination of all raised questions. This case underscores the complexities involved in banking law and the legal rights of guarantors in the context of financial disputes.
Court Lahore High Court
Entities Involved Union Bank Limited, Communication and Works Department, Government of Punjab
Judges MIAN HAMID FAROOQ, PARVEZ AHMAD
Lawyers Asghar Hameed Bhutta, Kh. Aamer Farooq
Petitioners , Messrs Mian Fakhar & Co.
Respondents , UNION BANK LTD.
Citations 2003 SLD 2918, 2003 CLD 848
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans, Advances, Credits and Finances) Act
Sections 10