| Case ID |
46720971-b0ea-41a5-8efc-6eadf7fc4dde |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Reference Case No. 37 of 1959 |
| Decision Date |
Feb 02, 1960 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The court held that the fees paid by Assam Bengal Cement Co. Ltd. for 'protection' against competition were of a capital nature and thus not deductible under section 10(2)(xvi) of the Income Tax Act. The judgment emphasized that an asset or advantage obtained for the enduring benefit of the trade is considered capital expenditure. The court analyzed the nature of the payments made by the company and concluded that these payments, designed to secure a competitive edge by preventing other parties from gaining access to limestone for cement production, were indeed capital expenditures. The decision was based on precedents that established a clear distinction between capital and revenue expenditures, reinforcing the principle that expenditures aimed at acquiring enduring benefits are classified as capital expenses. |
| Summary |
In the landmark case of Assam Bengal Cement Co. Ltd. vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, the Dacca High Court addressed the classification of expenditure under the Income Tax Act. The court examined whether the 'protection' fees paid by the appellant company to the government constituted capital or revenue expenditure. The ruling clarified that payments made for securing a competitive advantage in business, such as fees aimed at preventing competition, are deemed capital expenditures and are not deductible under the law. This case is vital for businesses seeking to understand the implications of their expenditure classifications for tax purposes. The judgment aligns with established legal principles regarding capital assets and revenue expenditures, making it a significant reference point for future cases involving similar tax issues. |
| Court |
Dacca High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Assam Bengal Cement Co. Ltd.,
The Government of Assam
|
| Judges |
Justice Akbar,
Justice Asir
|
| Lawyers |
R. R. Guha,
Md. Moazzem Hossain,
A. F. M. Mesbahuddin
|
| Petitioners |
Assam Bengal Cement Co. Ltd.
|
| Respondents |
The Commissioner of Income Tax, East Pakistan
|
| Citations |
1960 SLD 437,
1960 PLD 389
|
| Other Citations |
Messrs Assam Bengal Cement Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal A I R 1955 S C 89,
Messrs Mohan Lal Hargovind of Jubbulpore v. Commissioner of Income Tax, C. P. and Berar, Nagpur P L D 1949 P C 147,
British Insulated and Helsby Cables, Ltd. v. Atherton 1926 A C 205,
R. S. Munshi Gulab Singh & Sons v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Lahore A I R 1947 Lah. 82,
Benarsi Dass Jagannath of Amritsar v. Commissioner of Income Tax A I R 1947 Lab. 162,
In re The Century Spinning and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. A I R 1947 Bom. 445,
The Jagat Bus Service, Saharanpur v. Commissioner of Income Tax, U. P. and Ajmer Merwara, Lucknow A I R 1950 All. 295,
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay v. The Finlay Mills Ltd. A I R 1951 S C 464,
Commissioner of Income Tax, Calcutta v. Piggot Chapman & Co. A I R 1952 Cal. 414
|
| Laws Involved |
Income Tax Act (XI of 1922)
|
| Sections |
10(2)(xvi)
|