| Case ID |
46541dc3-3894-4527-b108-40da906918bc |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Criminal Appeal No. 17-K of 2016 |
| Decision Date |
Jun 09, 2017 |
| Hearing Date |
Jun 07, 2017 |
| Decision |
The Federal Shariat Court, presided over by Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jahan, delivered a decisive judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 17-K of 2016 on June 9, 2017. After a thorough examination of the evidence and arguments presented by both the appellant and the State, the court found significant lapses in the prosecution's case. Key factors influencing the decision included the delayed filing of the FIR by the complainant without a plausible explanation, inconsistencies in the complainant's statements regarding the items allegedly stolen, and the failure of the prosecution to provide corroborative evidence linking the appellant to the crime beyond reasonable doubt. Additionally, the absence of identification of the appellant by a credible eyewitness and the lack of recovery of stolen property further weakened the prosecution's position. In light of these deficiencies, the court concluded that the prosecution had not met its burden of proof satisfactorily. Consequently, the conviction and sentence passed by the lower court were set aside, and the appellant was acquitted of all charges. This judgment underscores the judiciary's commitment to upholding the principles of justice and ensuring that convictions are based on robust and credible evidence. |
| Summary |
In the landmark case of Criminal Appeal No. 17-K of 2016, adjudicated by the Federal Shariat Court on June 9, 2017, the appellant, Khamiso, successfully overturned his conviction under Sections 392 and 342 of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860. The case revolved around allegations of robbery and wrongful confinement, with the prosecution asserting that Khamiso, along with other co-accused, had committed the offenses. However, the appeal highlighted critical weaknesses in the prosecution's case, including a significant delay of over three months in filing the FIR, which lacked a plausible explanation. The complainant's inconsistent statements, particularly the omission of key details about the stolen mobile phones during court testimony, cast serious doubts on the credibility of the allegations. Furthermore, the absence of corroborative evidence and the failure of an eyewitness to identify Khamiso as one of the culprits undermined the prosecution's position. The court emphasized the importance of the presumption of innocence and the necessity for the prosecution to eliminate any reasonable doubts when establishing guilt. Citing the precedent set by Tariq Pervez v. State (1995 SCMR 1345), the court reaffirmed that even a single reasonable doubt is sufficient to acquit the accused. Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jahan underscored that the benefit of doubt is a fundamental right for the accused, not a discretionary grant. The judgment not only set aside the lower court's conviction and sentence but also acquitted Khamiso of all charges, highlighting the judiciary's role in safeguarding individual rights and ensuring that justice prevails through meticulous scrutiny of evidence and adherence to legal principles. This case serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of timely and consistent evidence, the need for credible eyewitness testimonies, and the judiciary's unwavering commitment to upholding the rule of law. For legal professionals and scholars, this judgment offers valuable insights into the procedural rigor and evidentiary standards that underpin fair trials within the Pakistani legal system. Additionally, it underscores the critical interplay between various sections of the Pakistan Penal Code and the Enforcement of Hudood Ordinance, emphasizing the comprehensive nature of criminal law and the responsibilities of both the prosecution and defense in the pursuit of justice. |
| Court |
Federal Shariat Court
|
| Entities Involved |
The State,
Federal Shariat Court
|
| Judges |
Mrs. Ashraf Jahan
|
| Lawyers |
Nadir Hussain M. Abro,
Zahoor Shah, Assistant Prosecutor General, Sindh
|
| Petitioners |
Khamiso
|
| Respondents |
The State
|
| Citations |
2017 SLD 1854,
2017 PLD 98
|
| Other Citations |
Tariq Pervez v. State 1995 SCMR 1345 rel.
|
| Laws Involved |
Pakistan Penal Code, 1860,
Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979
|
| Sections |
392,
342,
212,
17(3)
|