| Case ID |
44dd69a6-e6c3-4b71-ac30-12bb7c82c187 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
IT REFERENCE No. 418 OF 1979 |
| Decision Date |
|
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to spread the expenditure of Rs. 12 lakhs over the 20-year period of the agreement, treating it as revenue expenditure. The High Court affirmed that the expenditure was not for the initial starting of the business but was incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The Tribunal's conclusion that the expenditure was of a revenue nature was upheld, and it was determined that allowing the entire expenditure in the initial year would distort the computation of profits. The case emphasized that the nature of the expenditure should be viewed in light of the business operations and the agreements involved. |
| Summary |
This case revolves around the interpretation of Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, concerning whether an expenditure of Rs. 12 lakhs paid by Hindustan Aluminium Corpn. Ltd. to Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc. for technical consultation and training was capital or revenue in nature. The Calcutta High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to treat the expenditure as revenue, allowing it to be spread over the 20-year agreement period. The ruling clarified that the expenditure was incurred for the business's operational needs rather than for acquiring a capital asset, emphasizing the importance of understanding the purpose of expenditures in determining their nature. The decision aligns with precedents and affirms the Tribunal's rationale, highlighting the need for careful consideration of agreements and their implications on financial reporting. |
| Court |
Calcutta High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
Sabyasachi Mukharji J
|
| Lawyers |
Dr. D. Pal,
R.N. Bajoria,
Bagaria,
A.M. De,
B.L. Pal,
S. Mukherji
|
| Petitioners |
Hindustan Aluminium Corpn. Ltd.
|
| Respondents |
Commissioner of Income tax
|
| Citations |
1983 SLD 1094 = (1983) 144 ITR 474
|
| Other Citations |
Assam Bengal Cement Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1955] 27 ITR 34 (SC),
Pingle Industries Ltd. v. CIT [1960] 40 ITR 67 (SC),
CIT v. Basant Rai Takhat Singh [1933] 1 ITR 197 (PC),
Hindustan Commercial Bank Ltd. In re [1952] 21 ITR 353 (All.),
People Engg. & Motor (P.) Ltd. v. CIT [1981] 130 ITR 174 (Cal.),
Agarwal Hardware Works (P.) Ltd. v. CIT [1980] 121 ITR 510 (Cal.),
Benarsidas Jagannath, In re [1947] 15 ITR 185 (Lah.) (FB)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income-tax Act, 1961
|
| Sections |
37(1)
|