| Case ID |
44015ce9-47ac-4f44-b730-355e5106fd33 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
D-2741 of 1987 |
| Decision Date |
Jan 01, 1987 |
| Hearing Date |
Jan 01, 1987 |
| Decision |
The Madras High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, Massey Ferguson Perkins Ltd., deciding that the fees paid to the foreign company for technical information did not accrue or arise in India. The court referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Carborundum Co. v. CIT, which clarified that the provision of technical information by post constitutes a service rendered outside India. Consequently, the court found that there was no business connection as defined under the Income-tax Act, and thus, the Tribunal's decision to tax 75% of the income was incorrect. The court ruled against the Revenue, stating that the fees received by the foreign company could not be taxed under the relevant sections of the Income-tax Act. |
| Summary |
In the landmark case of Massey Ferguson Perkins Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, the Madras High Court adjudicated on the applicability of the Income-tax Act regarding the income accrued from a foreign company providing technical information to an Indian company. The court's decision emphasized the principle that income derived from services rendered outside India does not constitute taxable income in India, reinforcing the legal precedent set by the Supreme Court in Carborundum Co. v. CIT. This ruling is significant for foreign companies engaged in providing technical services remotely, as it clarifies the conditions under which such income is taxable in India. The decision also highlights the importance of establishing a 'business connection' as defined in the Income-tax Act, which serves as a critical factor in determining tax liability for foreign entities. This case is a vital reference for tax law practitioners and foreign investors seeking to understand the implications of income accrual and tax obligations in India. |
| Court |
Madras High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Massey Ferguson Perkins Ltd.,
Simpson & Company
|
| Judges |
Ramanujam, J.,
Shanmukham, J.
|
| Lawyers |
S.V. Subramaniam,
Subbaraya Aiyar,
Sethuraman,
Padmanabhan,
J. Jayaraman,
Nalini Chidambaram
|
| Petitioners |
Massey Ferguson Perkins Ltd.
|
| Respondents |
Commissioner of Income Tax
|
| Citations |
1987 SLD 2979,
(1987) 165 ITR 612
|
| Other Citations |
CIT v. Carborundum Co. [1973] 92 ITR 411 (Mad.)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income-tax Act, 1961,
Indian Income-tax Act, 1922
|
| Sections |
9,
42(1)
|