Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 4395228c-08e8-44ef-b500-20bd5ea244a1
Body View case body.
Case Number IT REFERENCE Nos. 314, 314A TO 314D OF 1975
Decision Date Oct 30, 1985
Hearing Date
Decision The Tribunal was justified in accepting the assessee's claim that the doubtful debts reserve and deferred taxation reserve should be included in the computation of the assessee's capital. The court found that the reserves did not meet a known or existing liability, thus classifying them as reserves rather than provisions. Therefore, both the deferred taxation reserve and the doubtful debts reserve were includible in the computation of the capital as per the provisions of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964.
Summary This case revolves around the interpretation of capital computation under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. The Bombay High Court examined whether the doubtful debts reserve and deferred taxation reserve should be included in the computation of the assessee's capital. The court emphasized that reserves established without any specific known liabilities could be included in capital computation. The decision followed previous judgments that distinguished between reserves and provisions, highlighting the nature of appropriations made ad hoc. This ruling reinforces the importance of understanding the nature of reserves in corporate finance and tax law, ensuring that companies accurately report their financial standing. Keywords: Companies Surtax, Capital Computation, Tax Law, Bombay High Court, Doubtful Debts, Deferred Taxation, Reserves vs Provisions.
Court Bombay High Court
Entities Involved Commissioner of Income Tax, Ruston & Hornsby India (P.) Ltd.
Judges M.H. Kania, ACTG. C.J., S.P. Bharucha, J.
Lawyers G.S. Jetly and Miss S.G. Shah for the Applicant, B.D. Damodar for the Respondent
Petitioners Commissioner of Income Tax
Respondents Ruston & Hornsby India (P.) Ltd.
Citations 1986 SLD 1739, (1986) 160 ITR 712
Other Citations Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1981] 132 ITR 559 (SC), CIT v. Hindustan Lever Ltd. [IT Reference No. 51 (Bom.) of 1975, dated 2-9-1985], Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd. v. CIT [1984] 150 ITR 484 (Bom.)
Laws Involved Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964
Sections Not available