| Case ID |
41c8906d-2e83-446a-b26e-5861151b6d1a |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Civil Appeal No. 2752 of 1972 |
| Decision Date |
May 08, 1980 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Supreme Court held that Piara Singh, a smuggler, is entitled to a deduction under section 10(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, for the loss incurred from the confiscation of currency notes used in his smuggling operations. The Court affirmed the High Court's ruling that the confiscation of Rs. 65,500 was a predictable loss associated with the illegal business of smuggling. It was determined that the currency notes were integral to the smuggling activity, and thus the loss should be recognized for tax purposes. The ruling emphasized that losses incurred in illegal businesses must be considered when calculating taxable profits. |
| Summary |
In the landmark case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala vs. (Sri) Piara Singh, the Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of tax deductions for illegal income activities under the Income Tax Act, 1922. The case arose when Piara Singh was apprehended with a substantial amount of currency while attempting to smuggle gold into India. Following the confiscation of the currency notes, the Income Tax Officer assessed Singh's income, asserting that a significant portion was derived from undisclosed sources. Singh contested this, claiming entitlement to a tax deduction for the confiscated amount as a business loss. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Singh, establishing that losses incurred in the course of illegal activities, such as smuggling, are indeed deductible under the relevant tax laws. This decision clarified the treatment of illegal income and losses for taxation purposes, emphasizing that such losses are integral to the operation of the business, thus meriting deduction. Key terms include 'income tax deduction', 'illegal business taxation', 'smuggling losses', and 'Income Tax Act, 1922'. The case has significant implications for how illegal income is treated in taxation and reinforces the principle of deductibility of business losses, regardless of the legality of the underlying activities. The decision serves as a crucial reference for future cases involving similar issues. |
| Court |
Supreme Court of India
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
P. N. BHAGWATI,
V. D. TULZAPURKAR,
R. S. PATHAK
|
| Lawyers |
G. A. Shah,
Miss A. Subhashini,
Naunit Lal,
Kailash Vasudev
|
| Petitioners |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA
|
| Respondents |
(SRI) PIARA SINGH
|
| Citations |
1986 SLD 5,
1986 PTD 26,
(1986) 53 TAX 70
|
| Other Citations |
Badridas Daga v. C. I. T. (1958) 34 I T R 10,
C. I. T., Gujarat v. S. G. Kothari (1971) 82 I T R 794,
Haji Aziz and Abdul Shakoor Bros. v. C. I. T., Bombay City II (1961) 41 a T R 350,
Soni Hinduji Kushalji & Co. v. C. I. T., A. P. (1973) 89 I T R 112 (A. P.),
I. S. Parkar v. V. B. Palekar (1974) 94 I T R 616 (Bom.)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income Tax Act, 1922
|
| Sections |
10,
10(1)
|