| Case ID |
40d54895-84c9-4fee-ac01-57deeae2413d |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Civil Petition No.201-K of 1997 |
| Decision Date |
Jan 27, 1998 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the decision of the appellate court, affirming that the defendants failed to file a written statement within the prescribed time and did not comply with the court's extensions. The defendants' counsel did not cross-examine the plaintiff's witnesses present in court, leading to the trial court's decree being upheld. The Supreme Court found no illegality or irregularity in the judgment that warranted interference and ultimately dismissed the petition, refusing leave. |
| Summary |
This case revolves around the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855, focusing on the right to compensation for families due to the loss of a loved one. The Supreme Court of Pakistan analyzed the failure of the defendants to respond in a timely manner and the implications of such negligence. The decision reinforces the importance of adhering to procedural timelines in civil litigation, ensuring that justice is served efficiently. The case emphasizes the role of the courts in upholding the rights of plaintiffs seeking compensation for fatal accidents, highlighting the legal responsibilities of defendants and their counsel. The ruling serves as a precedent in similar cases where delays and non-compliance can significantly impact the outcome. Key terms include Fatal Accidents Act, compensation, civil procedure, and judicial efficiency. |
| Court |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
|
| Entities Involved |
Islamic Republic of Pakistan,
Mst. Raeesa Begum
|
| Judges |
Mukhtar Ahmad Junejo,
Nasir Aslam Zahid
|
| Lawyers |
Naimur Rehman,
Akhlaq Ahmed Siddiqui,
Maj. Abbas
|
| Petitioners |
anothers,
Islamic Republic of Pakistan
|
| Respondents |
another,
Mst. Raeesa Begum
|
| Citations |
2003 SLD 690,
2003 SCMR 1701
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Fatal Accidents Act (XIII of 1855)
|
| Sections |
1
|