| Case ID |
3ee6689e-8184-43a6-9bde-3f751f023d30 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Appeal No. 12(105) of 1998 L. |
| Decision Date |
Jun 11, 1998 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The appeal filed by the complainant, Amir Ahmad, was dismissed based on the findings of the inquiry conducted into the allegations against him. The inquiry revealed that Amir Ahmad was guilty of subjecting his colleague to physical violence with a knife, leading to injuries. Despite his claims of wrongful dismissal due to trade union activities, there was no substantial evidence to support his assertion. The delay of over two years in filing the complaint raised further doubts regarding his claims of unfair labor practices. The Commission found that the dismissal was justified, and the appeal was deemed without merit. |
| Summary |
In the case of Amir Ahmad vs. Muhammad Akram Khan, the National Industrial Relations Commission addressed the issue of unfair labor practices following the dismissal of Amir Ahmad from NESPAK. The complainant alleged that his dismissal was a result of his active participation in trade union activities. However, the evidence presented during the inquiry indicated that he was dismissed for serious misconduct involving physical violence against a colleague. The Commission highlighted the absence of credible evidence supporting the claim of victimization based on union activities. Additionally, the significant delay in filing the complaint raised questions about the legitimacy of the claims. Ultimately, the Commission upheld the dismissal, emphasizing the importance of maintaining workplace safety and the integrity of disciplinary procedures. This case underscores the need for employees to substantiate claims of unfair treatment with clear evidence, particularly in labor relations contexts. It serves as a reminder of the legal frameworks governing workplace conduct and the protections afforded to employees under the Industrial Relations Ordinance. |
| Court |
National Industrial Relations Commission
|
| Entities Involved |
NESPAK (PVT.) LTD
|
| Judges |
MUHAMMAD AKBAR,
ZIA MAHMOOD MIRZA,
GHULAM NAUMAN SHAIKH
|
| Lawyers |
Sahibzada Muhammad Anwar,
Jawad Hassan
|
| Petitioners |
AMIR AHMAD EX GUARD GRADE I NESPAK (PVT.) LTD
|
| Respondents |
another,
MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN, EXECUTIVE SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, NESPAK LAHORE
|
| Citations |
2002 SLD 1685,
2002 PLC 20
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)
|
| Sections |
15,
22 D,
53
|