Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 3d57950a-2eb6-4b43-ba66-c3a8700c123d
Body View case body.
Case Number First Appeal from Order 21 of 2004
Decision Date Aug 12, 2005
Hearing Date May 27, 2005
Decision The appeal was accepted, and the judgment passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge-II-cum-Controller, Quetta on 10-5-2004 was set aside. The eviction application filed by the appellant was allowed, directing the respondents to hand over the vacant possession of the property in question within four months. The court found that the landlord's personal bona fide requirement for his son was established through independent evidence, despite the non-production of the son as a witness not being fatal to the case.
Summary This case revolves around the eviction application filed by the landlord under the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, on the grounds of bona fide personal need for his son. The court analyzed the evidence presented, including the landlord's ownership claims and the need for the property. The judgment emphasizes the importance of independent evidence in proving bona fide personal requirement, ruling that even if the son was not presented as a witness, the landlord's claim was supported by credible testimony. The case highlights legal principles surrounding eviction applications, the discretion of landlords in choosing suitable properties, and the implications of prior agreements in eviction proceedings. Keywords such as 'eviction', 'landlord rights', and 'bona fide needs' are trending in legal discussions.
Court Quetta High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges AMANULLAH KHAN, J
Lawyers Naeem Akhtar Afghani, Ch. Muhammad Arshad
Petitioners SIKANDAR KHAN
Respondents Syed ABDUL HALEEM AGHA, Islam Coal Company, Hazrat Agha
Citations 2006 SLD 1939, 2006 CLC 112
Other Citations 1968 SCMR 1087, 1978 SCMR 437, PLD 1979 Lah. 453
Laws Involved West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959
Sections 13, 15, 14