| Case ID |
3d4b8443-ae9c-47e6-b588-c189bc1d0365 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
I.T.Cs. Nos. 173 to 182 of 1993 |
| Decision Date |
Dec 21, 2006 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Sindh High Court ruled that the Income Tax Ordinance's penalty provisions are quasi-criminal in nature and require the establishment of mens rea before imposing penalties for concealment of income. The court found that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had erred in its determination regarding the justification of penalties imposed on Habib Bank Ltd. for overstating foreign income remittances. The court emphasized that the department must prove guilty intent before penalties can be enforced. As a result, the Tribunal's decision to cancel the penalty orders was upheld. |
| Summary |
This case revolves around the taxation laws applicable to Habib Bank Ltd. under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 and the Income Tax Act, 1922. The central issue was whether the penalties imposed for the concealment of income were justified given the quasi-criminal nature of the provisions, which necessitate the proof of mens rea. The court scrutinized the facts of the case, including the bank's claimed rebates on foreign income and the evidence supporting the claims. It was determined that the Income Tax Officer failed to establish that the bank acted with guilty intent when overstating remittances. This ruling underscores the importance of intent in tax law and the necessity for tax authorities to substantiate claims of wrongdoing before imposing penalties. The decision reinforces the legal principle that penalties in tax matters must be substantiated by clear evidence of malicious intent, aligning with precedents established in prior case law. The court's ruling provides clarity on the interpretation of tax laws and the requisite evidentiary standards for imposing penalties, making it a significant reference for future cases involving tax disputes. |
| Court |
Sindh High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Habib Bank Ltd.
|
| Judges |
ANWAR ZAHEER,
JAMALI,
MUHAMMAD ATHAR SAEED
|
| Lawyers |
Jawaid Farooqui,
Iqbal Salman Pasha
|
| Petitioners |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
|
| Respondents |
HABIB BANK LTD.
|
| Citations |
2007 SLD 41,
2007 PTCL 613,
2007 PTD 901,
(2007) 95 TAX 336,
2007 PTR 204
|
| Other Citations |
Syed Akhtar Ali v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad (1994) 69 Tax 38,
Gharibwal Cement Limited through General Manager v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan, Lahore and 2 others 2005 PTD 1,
D.G. Khan Cement Company Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others 2004 PTD 1179,
Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal I, and another v. Anwar Ali (1970) 76 ITR,
Commissioner of Income Tax, Andhra Pradesh v. C.V.C. Mining Company, Gudur (1976) 102 ITR 830,
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Hari Ram Sri Rain (1988) 57 Tax 51,
Muhammad Muslim v. Commissioner of Income Tax Karachi (1980) 42 Tax 129,
Commissioner of Income Tax, Lahore Zone, Lahore v. Kamran Steel Re-Rolling Mills (1989) 60 Tax 13,
Commissioner of Income Tax (Rawalpindi Zone), Rawalpindi v. Ch. Fazal Din and Sons, Sialkot (1974) 29 Tax 110
|
| Laws Involved |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979,
Income Tax Act, 1922
|
| Sections |
62,
65,
111,
116,
135,
136,
136(2),
137,
A(1)(v) of Part-II, 1st Schedule
|