Case ID |
3ccaf92f-3349-45fa-b0d6-9a94fcbdc01e |
Body |
View case body. Login to View |
Case Number |
240/158 of 1985 |
Decision Date |
Sep 02, 1985 |
Hearing Date |
Sep 02, 1985 |
Decision |
The Service Tribunal determined that the adverse remarks against Muhammad Yar, a Sub-Inspector of Police, were not sustainable due to the circumstances surrounding the dismissal and subsequent reinstatement. The Tribunal emphasized that the charges of corruption were not proven as the dismissal was eventually set aside and only a minor penalty was imposed. The remarks for the years 1981 and 1983 were scrutinized, and it was concluded that the adverse remarks from 1981 should be expunged, while those from 1983 were justified based on the established facts of the case. |
Summary |
The case revolves around Muhammad Yar, a Sub-Inspector of Police, who faced adverse remarks leading to his dismissal. The remarks were based on allegations of corruption and misconduct during his service. However, the dismissal was later overturned, and the case was reviewed by the Service Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the adverse remarks for the earlier period were unjustified since the allegations were not proven. The decision emphasized the importance of fair evaluation in civil service and highlighted the need for due process in disciplinary actions. The case serves as a precedent for similar future cases involving civil service employees facing adverse actions. Keywords: civil service, adverse remarks, dismissal, corruption, disciplinary action. |
Court |
Service Tribunal, Punjab
|
Entities Involved |
Not available
|
Judges |
ABDUL HAMID CHAUDHRY,
MIAN FAIZ KARIM
|
Lawyers |
M.A. Aziz,
Masood Ahmed Ghuman
|
Petitioners |
MUHAMMAD YAR
|
Respondents |
2 others,
GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
|
Citations |
1986 SLD 1919,
1986 PLC 129
|
Other Citations |
Not available
|
Laws Involved |
Not available
|
Sections |
Not available
|