| Case ID |
3cc24e8f-5ad7-4f76-9d40-9e615537316b |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Civil Review Petition No. 15 of 1983 |
| Decision Date |
Feb 15, 1984 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Supreme Court of Pakistan dismissed the petition for review regarding the earlier decision on the Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal. The court found that the contention raised was substantially similar to that made during the previous appeal, which had already been rejected. The case involved the division of an evacuee house and the legal complexities surrounding the Letters Patent Appeal that had abated due to a failure to implead the legal representatives of the deceased party. The court concluded that there were no valid grounds for review, and the previous order was upheld. |
| Summary |
This case revolves around the legal dispute regarding the division of an evacuee house in Sialkot. The Supreme Court of Pakistan, in its decision dated February 15, 1984, addressed the complexities of the Letters Patent Appeal and the implications of the Law Reforms Ordinance of 1972. The ruling emphasized the procedural aspects of legal representation and the jurisdiction of the court in reviewing earlier decisions. The court dismissed the review petition, affirming that the issues presented were not new and had been adequately addressed in previous hearings. This case highlights the importance of legal representation and timely action in the appeals process, underscoring critical principles in property law and administrative decisions. |
| Court |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
Nasim Hasan Shah,
M.S.H. Quraishi
|
| Lawyers |
Not available
|
| Petitioners |
Fahim Dad Khan and others
|
| Respondents |
Mst. Zubeda Begum and others
|
| Citations |
1985 SLD 757,
1985 SCMR 1345
|
| Other Citations |
Sardar Noor Hussain v. Chief Settlement Commissioner P L D 1983 S C 62
|
| Laws Involved |
Constitution of Pakistan (1973),
Supreme Court Rules, 1980
|
| Sections |
Art. 185(3),
0. XXVI, r. 1
|