Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 3af79087-91f0-4ae3-a5ca-59d5ce27bcb1
Body View case body.
Case Number KAR-85 of 1986
Decision Date Jul 22, 1987
Hearing Date Jul 22, 1987
Decision The appeal filed by Feroz Shah Abid on behalf of himself and 20 other workers was dismissed. The Labour Court found that individual workers must file their own grievance petitions and appeals. The claimants argued they were entitled to permanent employment due to their continuous service; however, the Tribunal held that their appointments were on a daily wage basis, and they did not fulfill the criteria for permanent status under the law. The court emphasized that one worker cannot represent others in grievance petitions, leading to the conclusion that the appeal lacked legal standing.
Summary This case involves an appeal before the Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh regarding the employment status of 21 workers at the Pakistan Steel Corporation. The workers claimed they were entitled to permanent employment due to continuous service, arguing against their repeated temporary appointments on daily wages. The Tribunal ruled that individual workers must file their own grievances and that the nature of their employment did not meet the criteria for permanent status. The decision underscores the importance of proper legal representation and adherence to labor laws in Pakistan, particularly under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. Key legal concepts include grievance petitions and the rights of workers under labor law. The case highlights the challenges faced by daily wage workers in securing permanent positions and the legal frameworks governing such employment relationships.
Court Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Entities Involved Pakistan Steel Corporation Ltd.
Judges Ali Namaz Bhudani
Lawyers Shams-ud-Din Khalid, Kamal Mansoor Alam
Petitioners 20 others, Muhammad Yousaf, Feroz Shah Abid
Respondents The Pakistan Steel Corporation Ltd., Karachi
Citations 1988 SLD 611, 1988 PLC 340
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969
Sections 25-A, 37