| Case ID |
3ad7fd8a-281a-4f04-ac62-b85ad4e471c2 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
IT REFERENCE NO. 41 OF 1974 |
| Decision Date |
May 04, 1984 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The court held that the amount of Rs. 1,02,500 received by the assessee as damages for breach of contract was not assessable as capital gains. The Tribunal's decision was justified as there was no transfer of a capital asset, and the right to sue for damages could not be considered a property under section 6(e) of the Transfer of Property Act. The case distinguished previous rulings that involved actual transfers of property or rights therein. |
| Summary |
In the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. J. Dalmia, the Delhi High Court examined the issue of whether damages received for breach of contract should be classified as capital gains under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court found that the damages awarded were not derived from a transfer of a capital asset. Specifically, the taxpayer had entered into a sales agreement for property under construction, but after the contractor's failure to execute the sale deed, the matter was referred to arbitration, resulting in an award of damages. The court clarified that a mere right to sue for damages does not constitute a capital asset, and therefore, the amount received was not subject to capital gains tax. This case underscores the importance of understanding the distinction between contractual rights and property rights in tax law, particularly in relation to capital gains taxation. The ruling emphasizes that damages for breach of contract do not equate to capital gains without a transfer of property. This case is pivotal for tax professionals and legal practitioners navigating capital gains issues in similar contexts. |
| Court |
Delhi High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
|
| Judges |
D.K. Kapur,
D.P. Wadhwa
|
| Lawyers |
K.K. Wadhera,
S.R. Mishra,
Hari Har Lal,
B.P. Maheswari
|
| Petitioners |
Commissioner of Income Tax
|
| Respondents |
J. Dalmia
|
| Citations |
1984 SLD 718,
(1984) 149 ITR 215
|
| Other Citations |
CIT v. Tata Services Ltd. [1980] 122 ITR 594 (Bom.),
Swami Motor Transports (P.) Ltd. v. Sri Sankaraswamigal Mutt AIR 1963 SC 864,
Sidhrajbhai Sabbai v. State of Gujarat AIR 1963 SC 540,
CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty [1981] 128 ITR 294 (SC)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income-tax Act, 1961
|
| Sections |
45,
2(47)
|