| Case ID |
3ab7ed75-10e5-433d-945f-3b77ee1d04c4 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Cr. A. No. 37-M of 2017 |
| Decision Date |
Jan 18, 2018 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The appeal was dismissed as it lacked merit. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove that the accused had used the forged identity card for impersonation or any fraudulent activity, thus the essential elements of the charges under sections 419, 468, and 471 of the Pakistan Penal Code were not established. The evidence presented did not confirm that the accused caused any harm or damage to the public or used the forged document as genuine. The court emphasized the principle of benefit of doubt, stating that any single doubt should favor the accused. The learned appellate court's decision to acquit the accused was upheld, affirming that the prosecution did not provide sufficient evidence to support the charges against him. |
| Summary |
This case revolves around the acquittal of Ihsanullah, an Afghan national accused of using a forged Pakistani National Identity Card. The prosecution alleged that he possessed a forged ID card and failed to provide evidence of his legal status as an Afghan refugee. The court analyzed the evidence presented, which did not substantiate the claims of cheating or forgery as defined under the Pakistan Penal Code sections. The judgment underscored the importance of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, affirming the principle that any doubt must benefit the accused. The ruling reiterated that mere possession of a forged document does not constitute an offense unless it is proven to be used for fraudulent purposes. The decision highlights the judicial approach towards evidence appreciation in criminal cases, particularly in appeals against acquittals, where the presumption of innocence is paramount. This case serves as a significant reference in understanding the application of criminal law regarding identity fraud and the rights of refugees. Keywords: identity fraud, criminal law, Pakistan Penal Code, acquittal, refugee rights, evidence appreciation. |
| Court |
Peshawar High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM KHAN, JUSTICE
|
| Lawyers |
Rafiq Ahmad, Assistant Advocate-General,
Ikramullah Khan for Respondent
|
| Petitioners |
THE STATE THROUGH AAG
|
| Respondents |
IHSANULLAH
|
| Citations |
2018 SLD 2578,
2018 PCRLJ 1288
|
| Other Citations |
Ishtiaq Ahmad Raja v. Ghazanfar Ali, S.I./FIA, Islamabad and another PLD 2004 Lah. 767,
Muhammad Iqbal v. Abid Hussain alias Mithu and 6 others 1994 SCMR 1928
|
| Laws Involved |
Pakistan Penal Code, 1860,
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898),
Foreigners Act, 1946
|
| Sections |
419,
468,
471,
410,
417,
14
|