| Case ID |
3a8be782-7e48-4d1b-b634-7cc418cd6d83 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Application No. 142 of 1983 |
| Decision Date |
Jul 18, 1984 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Labour Appellate Tribunal dismissed the petition under section 25-A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, ruling that the applicant's dismissal was not a result of victimization due to trade union activities. The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide strong and unequivocal evidence to support claims of victimization, and the domestic inquiry was deemed fair and impartial. The applicant's claims of an unfair dismissal process were rejected, affirming the legitimacy of the charges against him. |
| Summary |
In the case involving the Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh, the applicant, Ghulam Akbar, sought reinstatement following his dismissal from Karachi Pipe Mills Ltd. The tribunal evaluated claims of victimization based on trade union activities, ultimately finding insufficient evidence to substantiate these allegations. The court emphasized the importance of corroborative evidence in allegations of victimization, and upheld the disciplinary actions taken against the applicant. This case highlights the complexities of labor law, particularly regarding employee rights and the balance of power between workers and management. Key terms such as 'victimization,' 'trade union activities,' and 'impartial inquiry' are crucial in understanding the legal landscape surrounding labor disputes, making this case a significant reference for similar future cases. |
| Court |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
|
| Entities Involved |
|
| Judges |
SAIYID SAEED ASHHAD
|
| Lawyers |
S. P. Lodhi,
S. M. Yaqoob
|
| Petitioners |
GHULAM AKBAR
|
| Respondents |
MESSRS KARACHI PIPE MILLS LTD., KARACHI
|
| Citations |
1984 SLD 2010,
1984 PLC 1710
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)
|
| Sections |
25-A
|