| Case ID |
39781751-3ade-49ce-8033-66d1774f281b |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Miscellaneous Civil Case No.281 of 1993 |
| Decision Date |
Apr 17, 1996 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The court concluded that the Tribunal was justified in not treating the computer as an office appliance and allowing the investment allowance thereon. The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the Income Tax Act, particularly section 32-A(2)(b)(iii), which provides for investment allowance on machinery used for manufacturing or production. The court distinguished the role of computers in industrial activities from that of mere office appliances, thereby affirming the entitlement of the assessee to the investment allowance. This ruling aligns with previous judgments and underlines the importance of recognizing the functional role of technology in modern manufacturing processes. |
| Summary |
In the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Steel Tubes of India Ltd., the Madhya Pradesh High Court addressed the classification of computers under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The key legal question was whether computers should be considered as office appliances, thereby disqualifying them from investment allowance under section 32-A(2)(b)(iii). The court determined that computers, essential for the manufacturing process, do not fall under the category of office appliances and thus qualify for the investment allowance. This case highlights the evolving interpretation of tax laws in relation to technological advancements in manufacturing, emphasizing the need for legal frameworks to adapt to contemporary industrial practices. The ruling not only affirms the right to investment allowance for technology integral to production but also sets a precedent for similar cases in the future, reinforcing the significance of technology in enhancing productivity and efficiency in manufacturing sectors. |
| Court |
Madhya Pradesh High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax,
STEEL TUBES OF INDIA LTD.
|
| Judges |
A.R. TIWARI,
N. K. JAIN
|
| Lawyers |
D.D. Vyas,
P.M. Choudhary
|
| Petitioners |
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax
|
| Respondents |
STEEL TUBES OF INDIA LTD. (No. 1)
|
| Citations |
1999 SLD 408,
1999 PTD 2828,
(1997) 228 ITR 38
|
| Other Citations |
CIT v. Shaw Wallace & Co. Ltd. (1993) 201 ITR 17 (Cal.),
CIT v. Peerless Consultancy Services (Pvt.) Ltd. (1990) 186 ITR 609 (Cal.),
Softek (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (1990) 32 ITD 540 (Delhi)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income Tax Act, 1961
|
| Sections |
32A(2)(b)(iii)
|