Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 39630b71-c4dc-45bb-9dc9-2c8502317549
Body View case body.
Case Number N/A
Decision Date Jan 18, 2010
Hearing Date Jan 18, 2010
Decision The court found that the trial court had failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Order I, Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs representative suits. The court noted that the plaintiffs had filed a proper application to sue through representatives due to the large number of defendants. The trial court's decree was set aside and the case was remanded for a fresh trial in accordance with the law. This decision emphasized the importance of following procedural rules to avoid unnecessary delays and wastage of resources in the judicial process.
Summary This case revolves around a civil suit filed for declaration, injunction, and possession of land by residents of Mauza Beshooni. The suit was initiated due to the large number of inhabitants, making individual suits impractical. The plaintiffs applied to sue through representatives, but the trial court overlooked this application, leading to a decree in favor of the plaintiffs. The appellate court also failed to address the procedural irregularity. The High Court intervened, emphasizing strict adherence to legal procedures and remanded the case for proper handling in the trial court. This case highlights the significance of legal compliance in civil litigation and the consequences of judicial oversight. Keywords: civil procedure, representative suits, Peshawar High Court, Specific Relief Act, judicial compliance.
Court Peshawar High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges ABDUL AZIZ KUNDI, J
Lawyers Abdul Sattar Khan, Syed Wilayat Ali Shah Bukhari, Shah Baroz Khan Buneri
Petitioners others, SAHIB GUL, ABDUL AZIZ KUNDI
Respondents others, MARWARANG
Citations 2010 SLD 2581, 2010 CLC 658
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Sections 8, 42, 54, O.I, R.8, S.99