| Case ID |
394edd7f-182f-452b-9d01-17b44d33d0dc |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
IT REFERENCE No. 86 OF 1954 |
| Decision Date |
Sep 23, 1958 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Tribunal concluded that the assessee company could not set off its losses from the year 1948-49 against the profits made in 1950-51 due to the specific provisions in the Indian Income-tax Act. The losses incurred in the Indian State of Indore could only be set off against profits made in the same Indian State, as stipulated in section 24(1). The assessment year 1950-51 was subject to the unified tax laws, and thus the conditions for carrying forward losses under section 24(2) were not satisfied. Consequently, the claim for set-off against the current year's profits was untenable. The second question regarding the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation was found to be valid, as the provisions allowed for it under the applicable laws. |
| Summary |
The case of Indore Malwa United Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax revolves around the intricate issues of tax law in the context of the integration of Indian States and the applicability of the Indian Income-tax Act. The primary focus was on whether the losses incurred by the assessee company in 1948-49 could be carried forward to set off against profits in subsequent years, specifically in 1950-51. The court examined sections 24(1) and 24(2) of the Income-tax Act, which govern the set-off and carry forward of losses. It was determined that since the losses from the Indian State of Indore could not be set off against profits earned outside the Indian State, the claim was rejected. The ruling highlighted the complexities introduced by the transition from state-specific tax laws to a unified income tax framework, emphasizing the significance of adherence to legislative provisions. Additionally, the case addressed the treatment of depreciation allowances, affirming the right to carry forward unabsorbed depreciation under the relevant tax laws. Overall, this case underscores the importance of understanding the legal framework governing taxation and the implications of historical tax laws on contemporary assessments. |
| Court |
Bombay High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
Chagla, C.J.,
S.T. Desai, J.
|
| Lawyers |
Mr. Kolah
|
| Petitioners |
Indore Malwa United Mills Ltd.
|
| Respondents |
Commissioner of Income Tax, (Central)
|
| Citations |
1959 SLD 215,
(1959) 35 ITR 271
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Indian Income-tax Act,
Taxation Laws (Part B States) (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1950
|
| Sections |
24(1),
24(2),
Clause 2,
Clause 3
|