Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 393f1ef6-a029-49da-9064-7c3028ae7da9
Body View case body.
Case Number Criminal Accountability Appeal No. 38 of 2012
Decision Date Mar 13, 2013
Hearing Date
Decision The court allowed the application for remission for the appellant, ruling that the rights to remission had accrued at the time of arrest and that subsequent changes in law should not retroactively affect those rights. The Superintendent Jail was directed to grant remission according to Jail Rules. This decision emphasized that laws should not take away pre-existing rights without clear intentions expressed in the new legislation.
Summary In the case of Abdul Qadir Tawakkal vs. The State, the Sindh High Court addressed the issue of remission of sentence under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999. The appellant, who was arrested in 1996 and initially tried under a different ordinance, argued that he was entitled to remission based on the laws in effect at the time of his arrest. The court found that the introduction of section 10(d) of the Ordinance, which prohibited remission, did not have retrospective effect and thus the appellant's rights to remission were preserved. This case highlights the legal principles concerning the retroactive application of laws and the protection of rights accrued under previous legal frameworks. The ruling reinforces the notion that changes in law cannot deprive individuals of rights that existed when the legal action commenced, thus ensuring justice and fairness in legal proceedings.
Court Sindh High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges SAJJAD ALI SHAH, NAIMATULLAH PHULPOTO
Lawyers Shahab Sarki, Zulfiqar Ali Langah, Shahnawaz M. Sahito, Noor Muhammad Dayo
Petitioners ABDUL QADIR TAWAKKAL
Respondents THE STATE
Citations 2013 SLD 2322 = 2013 PLD 481
Other Citations M. Aslam Mouvia v. Home Secretary PLD 2011 Lah. 323 rel., Shah Hussain v. State PLD 2009 SC 460 ref.
Laws Involved National Accountability Ordinance, 1999
Sections 10(d), 16A