Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 38b1b103-ccce-42cb-8ffe-ec1b9c3e19c8
Body View case body.
Case Number L. R. No. 23 of 2000
Decision Date Jun 18, 2001
Hearing Date Jul 14, 2001
Decision The Labour Appellate Tribunal set aside the Labour Court's judgment dated 28-09-2000, which had dismissed the appeal on a technicality regarding the filing of the appeal under section 17 of the Payment of Wages Act. The Tribunal found that the law did not explicitly require the employer to file the appeal personally, thus allowing representation by an attorney or counsel. The case was remanded to the Labour Court for a decision on the merits, emphasizing that procedural technicalities should not hinder the pursuit of justice.
Summary In the case involving the Labour Appellate Tribunal, the core issue revolved around the interpretation of section 17 of the Payment of Wages Act, which governs the filing of appeals against orders of payment of wages. The Tribunal found that the Labour Court had erroneously dismissed the appeal on the grounds that it was not filed in person by the employer. The Tribunal highlighted that the language of the law did not prohibit representation by legal counsel, thus ensuring that procedural requirements do not obstruct access to justice. The case underscores the importance of allowing legal representation and the need for courts to focus on substantive justice rather than procedural technicalities. This ruling is significant for employers and employees alike, as it clarifies the rights to appeal and the manner in which appeals can be filed under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936.
Court Labour Appellate Tribunal, N.W.F.P.
Entities Involved Pakistan Tobacco Company, Yousaf Khan
Judges Sardar Muhammad Raza
Lawyers Barrister Jehanzaib Rahim, Zain Khan
Petitioners Personnel Manager
Respondents Mst. Rekhmeena
Citations 2001 SLD 2241, 2001 PLC 634
Other Citations 1989 PLC 176
Laws Involved Payment of Wages Act, 1936, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969
Sections 15, 17, 38(3)(a)