Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 38707dbc-ae0e-4122-8fdc-ab314a261d1e
Body View case body.
Case Number CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 1275 TO 1277 OF 1970
Decision Date Nov 05, 1974
Hearing Date
Decision The Supreme Court held in favor of the assessee, concluding that the declaration filed under section 17(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, was operative in relation to reassessments for the assessment years 1955-56 to 1957-58. The Court emphasized that the term 'assessment' in this context includes reassessment, thereby allowing the declaration to impact earlier assessments that were reopened. The decision reversed the judgment of the Madras High Court, affirming that the declaration should be considered valid for all assessments made after its filing, irrespective of the year.
Summary In the case of K.L. Varadarajan v. Commissioner of Income Tax, the Supreme Court of India deliberated on the applicability of a declaration made under section 17(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, in relation to reassessments for the assessment years 1955-56 to 1957-58. The case arose when the assessee, who was studying abroad, sought to declare his income at rates appropriate to his world income, which was rejected by the Income-tax Officer (ITO) due to late filing. This led to the reopening of previous assessments. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal sided with the assessee, but the Madras High Court ruled against him. The Supreme Court ultimately decided that the declaration was valid and applicable to reassessments, emphasizing the comprehensive nature of the term 'assessment' as including reassessment. This ruling clarifies the interpretation of tax law regarding declarations and reassessments, offering a significant precedent in income tax jurisprudence.
Court Supreme Court of India
Entities Involved Not available
Judges H.R. Khanna, A.C. Gupta
Lawyers S.T. Desai, J. Ramamurthi, Hardayal Hardy, S.P. Nayar
Petitioners K.L. Varadarajan
Respondents Commissioner of Income Tax
Citations 1975 SLD 559 = (1975) 98 ITR 182
Other Citations CIT v. K.L. Varadarajan [1970] 75 ITR 23, Commissioners for General Purposes of IT for the City of London v. Gibbs [1942] AC 402, CIT v. Khemchand Ramdas [1938] 6 ITR 414, A.N. Lakshmana Shenoy v. ITO [1958] 34 ITR 275
Laws Involved Income-tax Act, 1961, Indian Income-tax Act, 1922
Sections 113, 147, 17(1), 34