| Case ID |
3702aaa9-6655-424a-913f-aba19520fee3 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
WEALTH-TAX REFERENCE No. 296 OF 1967 |
| Decision Date |
May 28, 1973 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The case revolved around the ownership of shares held by the assessee, Smt. Sumitra Devi Jalan, which were claimed to be lost due to theft. The court determined that the assessee did not possess legal ownership of the shares but rather had equitable rights due to the blank transfer deeds. Consequently, the tribunal's decision to include only the sum advanced to the receiver for acquiring right shares in the net wealth was upheld. The court emphasized that assets lost or stolen should not be included in the net wealth for tax purposes, establishing a precedent for cases involving missing assets and equitable ownership. |
| Summary |
In the case of Commissioner of Wealth-tax vs. Smt. Sumitra Devi Jalan, the Calcutta High Court addressed critical issues regarding the definition of net wealth under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The case involved Smt. Jalan, who had claimed ownership of 22,440 ordinary shares of Rohtas Industries Ltd. but alleged that these shares were lost in 1954 due to theft. The court examined the nature of ownership concerning shares held on blank transfer deeds and concluded that while the assessee had equitable rights, she was not the legal owner of the shares. This case is significant for tax law as it clarifies the treatment of lost or stolen assets in wealth tax assessments. The decision emphasizes the distinction between legal ownership and equitable rights, providing guidance for future cases involving similar circumstances. The outcome confirmed that only the amounts advanced for acquiring rights in the shares were to be included in the net wealth calculation, thus protecting the assessee from being taxed on assets that were no longer in her possession. |
| Court |
Calcutta High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
Sabyasachi Mukharji,
S. Hazra
|
| Lawyers |
Ajit Sengupta,
R.N. Bajoria
|
| Petitioners |
Commissioner of Wealth-tax
|
| Respondents |
Smt. Sumitra Devi Jalan
|
| Citations |
1974 SLD 632 = (1974) 96 ITR 35
|
| Other Citations |
Black v. Homersham [1878-79] L.R. 4 Ex D. 24,
Smt. Chandra Jalan v. CWT (Matter No. 378 of 1962),
CWT v. Mohan Lal Nopany [1970] 78 ITR 435 (Cal.),
CWT v. Smt. Radha Debi M. Nopany [1970] 77 ITR 704 (Cal.),
Kishanlal Haricharan v. ITO [1972] 86 ITR 141 (SC),
Mathalone v. Bombay Life Assurance Co. Ltd. AIR 1953 SC 385,
Nagabushanam v. Ramachandra Rao [1922] ILR 45 Mad. 537,
Nanney v. Morgan [1888] 37 Ch.D. 346 (CA),
O'Meara v. Benet [1921] AIR 1921 PC 190,
Richards v. Wimbush : Wimbush, In re [1940] Ch. 92 (Ch.D.),
E.D. Sasson & Co. v. Patch [1943] 45 Bom. LR 46 (Bom.),
Smt. Sumitra Debi Jalan v. Satya Narayan Prahladka AIR 1965 Cal. 355,
Howrah Trading Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1959] 36 ITR 215 (SC)
|
| Laws Involved |
Wealth-tax Act, 1957
|
| Sections |
2(m)
|