Case ID |
36a301cb-96c8-4a1a-8bf8-522c6d8d1d4b |
Body |
View case body. Login to View |
Case Number |
First Rent Appeal No. 32 of 1995 |
Decision Date |
Nov 27, 1998 |
Hearing Date |
Nov 24, 1998 |
Decision |
The appeal under section 24 of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963, was dismissed. The court found that the tenants failed to contest the case adequately, and the Rent Controller's order for ejectment was upheld. The court noted that the tenants had multiple opportunities to present their case but did not do so, leading to a confirmation of the landlord's bona fide need for the property. The court emphasized that the conduct of the tenants amounted to an abuse of the judicial process, and thus, the appeal was dismissed with costs, requiring the appellant to vacate the premises within sixty days. |
Summary |
This case revolves around a rental dispute under the Cantonments Rent Restriction Act, where the landlord, represented by her daughter, sought the ejectment of the tenant due to bona fide personal need. The court highlighted the importance of the landlord-tenant relationship and the necessity for tenants to contest claims effectively. Despite previous litigation, the court found no merit in the tenant's defense, leading to a dismissal of the appeal. The decision underscores the significance of timely and effective legal representation in rental disputes, especially concerning personal needs of landlords. Keywords include 'Cantonment Rent Restriction,' 'bona fide need,' 'landlord-tenant relationship,' and 'ejectment order.' |
Court |
Sindh High Court
|
Entities Involved |
Messrs PETROTECH,
Mrs. SHIREEN FAROOQ,
Safia Zarin
|
Judges |
GHULAM NABI SOOMRO
|
Lawyers |
Habibullah Samo,
Tasawar Ali Hashmi
|
Petitioners |
Messrs PETROTECH through Managing Director
|
Respondents |
another,
Mrs. SHIREEN FAROOQ
|
Citations |
2000 SLD 2073,
2000 CLC 1806
|
Other Citations |
NLR 1982 (Civil) 655,
1980 CLC 67,
1992 CLC 102,
1993 CLC 1325
|
Laws Involved |
Cantonments Rent Restriction Act
|
Sections |
17,
24
|