| Case ID |
322950c3-6e4e-419b-9293-36b91c5e0f25 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Criminal M.A. No. 221 of 2011 and Criminal Appeal |
| Decision Date |
Jun 13, 2011 |
| Hearing Date |
Jun 13, 2011 |
| Decision |
The Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the convictions and sentences awarded by the Lahore High Court, enhancing the sentence of 14 years' R.I. under section 365-A of the Penal Code to life imprisonment with forfeiture of all moveable and immoveable properties. The court ruled that the prosecution had proven the case beyond a reasonable doubt, and while the legal heirs of the deceased had entered into a compromise with one of the appellants, the gravity of the crime warranted a severe sentence. The court emphasized the importance of the goal of abduction for ransom rather than the role played by individual accused. The decision also addressed the principles governing sentencing under the relevant laws, ensuring justice was served in light of the established facts. |
| Summary |
This case revolves around a criminal appeal concerning abduction for ransom under section 365-A of the Penal Code. The Supreme Court of Pakistan reviewed the evidence presented, confirming the appellants' involvement in the abduction and subsequent ransom demand for the victim, Muhammad Saleem. The court noted the significant evidence against the accused, including witness testimonies that established their presence at the crime scene. Despite a compromise reached by the legal heirs of the deceased with one of the appellants, the court maintained that the severity of the crime necessitated a stringent sentence. The decision highlighted the legal framework surrounding abduction for ransom, emphasizing the court's obligation to impose appropriate penalties as dictated by law. By enhancing the sentences to life imprisonment, the Supreme Court reinforced its commitment to uphold justice and deter similar offenses in the future. This case serves as a critical reference for understanding the legal ramifications and judicial approaches to serious crimes such as abduction and ransom demands. |
| Court |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY C.J.,
TARIQ PARVEZ,
AMIR HANI MUSLIM, JJ
|
| Lawyers |
Muhammad Zaman Bhatti, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellants (on State expenses),
M. Akram Ch., Advocate Supreme Court and Arshad Ali Ch. Advocate-on-Record for Appellant No.1,
Zulfiqar Khalid Maluka, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant No.2,
Irfan Malik, Additional P.-G. for the State,
M. Siddiqui Baloch, Advocate Supreme Court for the Complainant
|
| Petitioners |
JAVED IQBAL,
USMAN HAIDER
|
| Respondents |
THE STATE
|
| Citations |
2012 SLD 1386 = 2012 SCMR 140
|
| Other Citations |
Maulana Nawab-ul-Hassan v. The State 2003 SCMR 658
|
| Laws Involved |
Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
|
| Sections |
365-A,
302,
201,
34
|