Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 32144673-88ca-486a-a494-c5e024956429
Body View case body.
Case Number Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1986/L of 1
Decision Date Jun 27, 2002
Hearing Date
Decision The Supreme Court dismissed the petition for leave to appeal against the judgment of the Lahore High Court which had upheld the decree of the lower courts in favor of the plaintiff, Mst. Aisha, who alleged that the disputed mutation was fraudulently obtained by her brother, the petitioner. The Court found that both lower courts had thoroughly examined the evidence and provided sound reasoning for their decisions. The petitioner failed to present a compelling case for interference by the Supreme Court, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Summary This case revolves around a dispute regarding a fraudulent property mutation involving Mst. Aisha and her brother, Nur Muhammad. The case highlights the principles of land revenue laws, particularly under the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, and the implications of fraudulent activity in property transactions. The Lahore High Court's ruling was based on evidence and legal reasoning, ultimately upheld by the Supreme Court of Pakistan. The decision underscores the importance of integrity in land transactions and the judiciary's role in preventing fraudulent claims. This case serves as a critical reference for land disputes, emphasizing the necessity for thorough examination of evidence and adherence to legal frameworks in property matters.
Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Entities Involved Not available
Judges MIAN MUHAMMAD AJMAL, TANVIR AHMAD KHAN
Lawyers Malik Noor Muhammad Awan, Advocate Supreme Court, S. Abul Aasim Jafri, Advocate-on-Record
Petitioners NUR MUHAMMAD
Respondents Mst. AISHA
Citations 2004 SLD 1245, 2004 SCMR 1585
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
Sections 45, 42, 185(3)