| Case ID |
31b1d693-546c-493c-aba1-7fa1699b49b4 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
WT REFERENCE No. 226 OF 1963 |
| Decision Date |
Aug 17, 1967 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The court held that a taxation demand not disputed by the assessee but kept outstanding for more than twelve months on the valuation date is not to be excluded in the computation of the net wealth of the assessee. The claim for deduction of Rs. 28,37,282 was disallowed by the Wealth-Tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Tribunal allowed the claim, but the High Court found that the amount was a taxation demand and the provisions of section 2(m)(iii)(b) of the Wealth-tax Act applied, thus denying the deduction. The decision of the Tribunal was not in line with the interpretation of the law, leading to a conclusion that the assessee was not entitled to claim the deduction. The verdict underscored the significance of the duration of outstanding tax debts in wealth computation. |
| Summary |
In the landmark case of WT REFERENCE No. 226 OF 1963, the Calcutta High Court addressed critical issues surrounding the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, specifically focusing on section 2(m). The case revolved around the question of whether a taxation demand, which was not disputed and had remained outstanding for over twelve months, could be excluded from the computation of net wealth. The Commissioner of Wealth Tax challenged the claim made by Jhagrakhand Collieries (P.) Ltd. for a deduction of Rs. 28,37,282. The court clarified that the nature of the debt remained a taxation demand despite recovery proceedings initiated under the Public Demands Recovery Act. The ruling emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory provisions when computing net wealth and highlighted the limitations placed on the deductibility of certain debts under the Wealth Tax Act. This case serves as a pivotal reference for future cases involving wealth tax computations, making it essential for tax practitioners and legal experts to grasp the implications of this decision, particularly in terms of outstanding tax liabilities and their treatment under the law. |
| Court |
Calcutta High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Commissioner of Wealth Tax,
Jhagrakhand Collieries (P.) Ltd.
|
| Judges |
Banerjee,
K. L. Roy
|
| Lawyers |
B. Pal,
D. Sen,
Dr. D. Pal
|
| Petitioners |
Commissioner of Wealth Tax
|
| Respondents |
Jhagrakhand Collieries (P.) Ltd.
|
| Citations |
1968 SLD 229,
(1968) 67 ITR 572,
(1970) 21 TAX 155
|
| Other Citations |
K.S. Venkataraman & Co. (P.) Ltd. v. State of Madras [1966] 60 ITR 112 (SC),
C.T. Senthilnathan Chettiar v. State of Madras [1968] 67 ITR 102 (SC),
Ramesh Behari Ghose v. Union of India [1962] 45 ITR 622 (Cal.),
Builders Supply Corporation v. Union of India [1965] 56 ITR 91 (SC)
|
| Laws Involved |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957
|
| Sections |
2(m)
|