| Case ID |
2ff05e7a-e8be-4a04-851f-4d3ac864827f |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
WRIT PETITION No. 14869 OF 2004 |
| Decision Date |
Feb 13, 2009 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Delhi High Court quashed the ruling of the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) which deemed that the income of U.A.E. Exchange Centre Ltd. accrued in India due to its liaison offices. The Court determined that the activities of the liaison offices were merely supportive and did not contribute directly to income generation in India. The Court emphasized that income should be taxed based on the provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) and not solely on the Income Tax Act. The ruling clarified that for taxing income in India, a Permanent Establishment (PE) must exist, which was not the case here as the liaison offices were engaged in auxiliary activities. The Court concluded that the AAR misapplied legal principles and ignored the relevant facts regarding the nature of the liaison offices' activities, leading to an erroneous conclusion. |
| Summary |
In the case of U.A.E. Exchange Centre Ltd. vs. Union of India, the Delhi High Court addressed the question of whether the income of a UAE-based remittance service provider was taxable in India. The petitioner operated liaison offices in India primarily to facilitate remittance services for non-resident Indians (NRIs) but argued that these offices did not generate income within India. The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, stating that the activities of the liaison offices were auxiliary and did not constitute a Permanent Establishment (PE) as defined under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and the UAE. The Court held that income should not be taxed based on supportive activities that did not directly contribute to the profits of the UAE enterprise. This ruling is significant for international tax law, particularly in defining the boundaries of taxable presence for foreign entities operating in India. |
| Court |
Delhi High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
|
| Judges |
Badar Durrez Ahmed,
Rajiv Shakdher
|
| Lawyers |
H.P. Ranina,
Vivek B. Saharya,
R.D. Jolly
|
| Petitioners |
U.A.E. Exchange Centre Ltd.
|
| Respondents |
Union of India
|
| Citations |
2009 SLD 1143,
(2009) 313 ITR 94,
(2009) 183 TAXMAN 495
|
| Other Citations |
UAE Exchange Centre LLC, In re [2004] 139 Taxman 82 (AAR - New Delhi),
CIT v. R.D. Aggarwal & Co. [1965] 56 ITR 20 (SC),
Anglo French Textiles Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1953] 23 ITR 101 (SC)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income Tax Act, 1961
|
| Sections |
245R,
90,
9
|